Comments Thread For: Hearn: Wilder Legal Rift is Fury's Problem, Should Not Affect Joshua Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bronx2245
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2013
    • 28474
    • 5,415
    • 1,410
    • 162,064

    #51
    Originally posted by REDEEMER
    Fury won’t fight Wilder again .

    AJ will have either Joyce or Usyk in 2022 and at least one more mandatory that year .

    Wilder would be looking at 2023 and odds on he takes an L if he fights legit guys are more then good from now until then .

    Worrying about landing a big fight with either champion is the least of his problems it ,should actually be improving how to box better .
    First things first, get that money from Top Rank from arbitration, then I say fight Andy Ruiz in a venue with fans! That's a do or die situation for them both, and FOX would love it! I think Ruiz beats him!

    Comment

    • Corelone
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 13316
      • 1,782
      • 849
      • 66,332

      #52
      Fury is going to eat his way out of this mess. A few more pounds and there won't be a case.

      Comment

      • thack
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 12864
        • 2,931
        • 1,340
        • 53,931

        #53
        This is the big one for Hearn , a two big fight pay out win or lose so if this goes Pete tong look for some real tears from Young Edward. Imagine Joshua having to face another Ruiz where his shares get completely wiped out although it looks safe with 'little Usyk' already put in place. If it's decided Wilder gets his contracted rematch then nobody should have a problem , that's what rematch clauses are for ................Ask Edward!

        Comment

        • KingGilgamesh
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2020
          • 1392
          • 524
          • 106
          • 8,713

          #54
          Originally posted by DougalDylan
          Google Finkel vs Shannon Briggs in the NYC courts and you'll see why no one believes anything Shelley says.
          Finkel is probably even worse TBH. Well aware of his issues with Tyson too.

          Comment

          • Motorcity Cobra
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2016
            • 32565
            • 1,106
            • 545
            • 963,610

            #55
            Originally posted by thack
            If it's decided Wilder gets his contracted rematch then nobody should have a problem , that's what rematch clauses are for ................Ask Edward!
            Fight him or pay him. Seems like they don't want to do either

            Comment

            • KingGilgamesh
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2020
              • 1392
              • 524
              • 106
              • 8,713

              #56
              Originally posted by Angeljuice
              It isn't, the contract was out of date and had expired.
              You've been trying to look for excuses why it won't happen, but it will.
              The court case doesn't prevent Fury from fighting, and if it were to somehow, the fight still goes ahead without the belt (not an undisputed championship, but still the biggest fight in years).

              I don't know why you Yanks don't believe this fight can be made, it's happening.
              Wilder said he wanted to unify the belts and then avoided anybody ranked under 100, AJ just went out and collected the belts. If you really want something you get it done, it's only when you pretend to want something that small issues are turned into excuses.

              Both fighters want this fight, both managers want this fight, both teams want this fight, all commissions want this fight, all the media want this fight, all boxing fans want this fight and you believe that Wilder can stop all this with an expired contract clause?
              Except, here we are. With no date despite Hearn saying just a few weeks ago that the fight would be "completed within two weeks".

              The problem with the whole Joshua image is that its catered to the unintelligent. Of which the UK has plenty. I would know, living here. Hearn can literally contradict himself within the same week and still have a bunch of nuthuggers hanging off his every word. He's like Bojo. And his adoring hearniacs are like the ****tards in northern england who voted Tory in 2019 only to get ****ed over the year later

              Comment

              • Monty Fisto
                And still...
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2018
                • 3435
                • 1,465
                • 855
                • 22,690

                #57
                Originally posted by thack
                This is the big one for Hearn , a two big fight pay out win or lose so if this goes Pete tong look for some real tears from Young Edward. Imagine Joshua having to face another Ruiz where his shares get completely wiped out although it looks safe with 'little Usyk' already put in place. If it's decided Wilder gets his contracted rematch then nobody should have a problem , that's what rematch clauses are for ................Ask Edward!
                If binding arbitration decides Wilder should get his fight against Fury, I don't have a problem with that.

                If they do, hopefully they make it contingent on a public declaration that he lost to the better man on the night in the first fight and an admittance that his laundry list of excuses is a fabrication.

                I think Joshua vs Fury seems more likely than Wilder vs Fury at the moment. If was Hearn, I'd be more worried at this stage about Fury's flakiness than Wilder upsetting the apple cart.

                Comment

                • Angeljuice
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2019
                  • 1236
                  • 42
                  • 23
                  • 28,717

                  #58
                  Originally posted by KingGilgamesh
                  Except, here we are. With no date despite Hearn saying just a few weeks ago that the fight would be "completed within two weeks".

                  The problem with the whole Joshua image is that its catered to the unintelligent. Of which the UK has plenty. I would know, living here. Hearn can literally contradict himself within the same week and still have a bunch of nuthuggers hanging off his every word. He's like Bojo. And his adoring hearniacs are like the ****tards in northern england who voted Tory in 2019 only to get ****ed over the year later
                  The UK has a higher average IQ than America. America is officially the dumbest nation in the Western world and that is documented fact in black and white.
                  You all have strong opinions without any knowledge of the subject in hand, as if not to have an opinion on something you are ignorant of is weak.

                  Just be a bit careful when you call a nation with documented superior intellect "unintelligent", because you sit below us on that table.

                  Comment

                  • REDEEMER
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Oct 2018
                    • 11820
                    • 1,336
                    • 1,008
                    • 153,574

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Monty Fisto
                    If binding arbitration decides Wilder should get his fight against Fury, I don't have a problem with that.

                    If they do, hopefully they make it contingent on a public declaration that he lost to the better man on the night in the first fight and an admittance that his laundry list of excuses is a fabrication.

                    I think Joshua vs Fury seems more likely than Wilder vs Fury at the moment. If was Hearn, I'd be more worried at this stage about Fury's flakiness than Wilder upsetting the apple cart.
                    An expired contract has no binding ties to it so no breach of contract can be claimed .

                    Wilder is looking for opponents he hasn’t fought yet ,he just put that on his Instagram. This isn’t something one says if he’s fighting Fury .

                    Comment

                    • Motorcity Cobra
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2016
                      • 32565
                      • 1,106
                      • 545
                      • 963,610

                      #60
                      Originally posted by REDEEMER
                      An expired contract has no binding ties to it so no breach of contract can be claimed .

                      Wilder is looking for opponents he hasn’t fought yet ,he just put that on his Instagram. This isn’t something one says if he’s fighting Fury .
                      You obviously didn't listen to the full one and a half hour interview. I did and what you're saying is wrong. He wants Fury and the others at the top in the division.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP