Comments Thread For: Hearn: Lara's KO Of Warrington 'Much Bigger Shock' Than Ruiz's Upset Of Joshua

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OnlytheTruth
    Roadman94's Daddy
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2019
    • 1330
    • 177
    • 91
    • 15,775

    #41
    Originally posted by Tecnoworld
    Just because AJ was (and is again) over hyped. He is a Frank Bruno with worse technique.
    If anything, because he has lost, he is being under-hyped considering what is around him at the moment: -

    1. Wilder - most padded/protected and unskilled fighter in history.

    2. Fury - most overhyped resume in history. Great but boring win over Klitschko and then a DRAW and a win against the most padded/protected and unskilled fighter in history

    Comment

    • Angeljuice
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2019
      • 1236
      • 42
      • 23
      • 28,717

      #42
      Originally posted by _Rexy_
      A "simple temple shot" in the third round caused your idol to quit in the seventh? Sounds like a hell of a problem
      Yes, it's called equilibrium. Anybody could beat any heavyweight in the world with a free shot to their temple beforehand as long as it was accurate and hard enough a shot.

      You can't punch if you have no arms, you can't stand when your equilibrium is all over the place.

      Comment

      • Drigo
        Super Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Sep 2018
        • 921
        • 70
        • 8
        • 15,247

        #43
        Hearn sound pathetic for justifying Warrington lose by comparing it to Joshua lose. Very clear he want to wash his hands for his short coming as promoter. He should have given Warrington a more meaningful fight and at least prevent him of giving up his belt...

        Comment

        • Tecnoworld
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2018
          • 1765
          • 279
          • 625
          • 21,338

          #44
          Originally posted by OnlytheTruth
          If anything, because he has lost, he is being under-hyped considering what is around him at the moment: -

          1. Wilder - most padded/protected and unskilled fighter in history.

          2. Fury - most overhyped resume in history. Great but boring win over Klitschko and then a DRAW and a win against the most padded/protected and unskilled fighter in history

          I comment what I see and when I see Fury, I think he has the highest skills in hw boxing since Alě and the fact he is such a huge person makes me think he is even more outstanding.

          I agree Wilder was overhyped and has very limited skills, but you have to agree that a punch from him could ko any hw in the division. This is not enough to be great and it was evident vs Wilder.

          Comment

          • Oldskoolg
            Racist trolls get blocked
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2019
            • 12161
            • 5,396
            • 9,800
            • 82,563

            #45
            Originally posted by thack
            It's not what the people who put these odds together say young Edward ...I think your telling more porkies Edward. Unless he's saying that the fighter who lost to Parker but beat Joshua came as no real surprise to him , meaning he doesn't have much confidence in the big lad...oh dear and this going into such a big level up fight.....I see why he insisted on a two payday deal now.
            Ppv I reckon.....

            Comment

            • Oldskoolg
              Racist trolls get blocked
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2019
              • 12161
              • 5,396
              • 9,800
              • 82,563

              #46
              Originally posted by OnlytheTruth
              Not sure where you formulated that he was supposed to be the best boxer in 30 years. I think you are the only person to ever say that, in jest or not.

              Bit of a pointless exercise to call him out though. Joshua barely broke a sweat with Martin. Now suddenly Martin is in the same conversation as Wilder.

              Warrington suffering a shock loss at feather to a heavy handed Lara is just as shocking as Joshua losing to Ruiz due to the HW division punchers chance probability.

              What I don't like about your post is that you are kind of saying that up-and-comers, who have been marketed amazingly well, can't suffer shock losses. That's 100% ridiculous. You're in the realms of 'a boxer cannot win a fight unless its a hospitalising knockout, just because its not entertaining'.
              No he’s right. There were posters on here literally comparing Joshua to Ali and how he was going to be one of the greatest ever etc etc. Given most of those posters were Nigerians and Edward Hearn arse lickers it tends to go into one ear and out the other but the poster is right, the casual class of posters (of which there are many on here) were maiming similar claims

              Comment

              • budfr
                Stick N Move 2 Slick
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 4252
                • 323
                • 155
                • 20,869

                #47
                Why do they keep saying that Joshua´s defeat was one of the biggest upsets in history?? BS. Only casuals shlud say that. Ruiz was a good boxer who already had fought for a title in New Zealand and most people thought he should have won or a draw.He lost by decision to the hometown guy, Parker...Joshua is simply overhyped because he is British and in recent years, England has been pumping money and influence in pro boxing ( DAZN, Hearn, etc ). 10 years ago no one in America even knew about Brits, just a couple appeared on the scene every now and then.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP