Comments Thread For: Fury and Joshua Still To Agree Whose Name Comes First

[DaNeutral.]

Shut your pizzy fücking mouth.

Who the **** do you think you are to question privilege?


Go back to sucking that black man's ****, boy

LOL what the FKK would you know about privilege?

[DaNeutral.]

Whose name comes 1st? The one with the most belts in my opinion. Especially real ones.

So that would be Joshua.

[GGG Gloveking]

LOL what the FKK would you know about privilege?

I'm white. Enough said.

Membership has its privileges.

Fury-Joshua

[Blackstarr]

listen captain sensitive, I know how it works historically and it’s ******, always has been. Which was why I made my comment. It’s a ****** thing to hold up a negotiation and it’s ****** that it’s primarily based on who has more groupie fans. By that logic Ryan Garcia should get top billing over every lightweight while his biggest win is Luke Campbell. Fury is undefeated, was champion first, has the better wins and is ranked higher. He should be above Joshua based on boxing career itself, but Joshua will likely get top billing because uk fans are more passionate for Aj for whatever reason.

“For whatever reason” lol, is it really that hard to figure out? Boxing has always been more in love with dynamic punchers whose fights are full of KOs. Add to that, AJ didn’t get busted for PEDs and take a 2-year ring absence. Furthermore AJ isn’t a bald, middle-aged looking man with an unflattering physique, so he gets bigger promotional/marketing backing and has a broader range of appeal that includes women. Simplifying people’s legitimate demand choice by labelling them a groupie is just ******. I’m taking it you were never the brightest tool in the shed.

I take your point that fight billing should be determined on ranking. In a lot of instances however, ranking is subjective and not universally agreed. What everyone can agree on is the economics that each fighter brings, and that’s what prizefighting boils down to. The only thing ****** in this scenario is not acknowledging this.

[davef]

Actually Joshua Fury sounds better. Joshua is actually a first name. Idk lol

They should call it "Joshua Fury' since Tyson is going to make him his son anyway

[thack]

How is this even a debating point? As much as Fury is recognised as the favourite, AJ is by far the bigger commercial draw, has the more recognisable name and has the most belts. Am I actually missing something here?

I suppose you are ....like the massive & important American market where Fury is by far more popular with his Wilder fights compared to Joshua's disappointing outing at MSG with Ruiz.

[hugh grant]

I don't care just get em in ring

[1hourRun]

A side and we all know who that is. Don't we?

Fury took a backseat to Deontay 'Bronze-Bomber' Wilder, the first and second time. I'm no fan of Anthony Joshua, and I know this information is going to burn the 'Fury-Faithful', but A.J is he only HW to fight in a arena during COVID-19 and even got Floyd 'Money' Mayweather to fly overseas to attend Joshua's title defense vs. Kubrat Pulev.

Tyson Fury, is a nobody in America and in the UK. The Gypsy-Bum, has publicly complained and criticized the UK fans for their lack of support ( and I dont blame them ), vowing never to fight in England ever again. Why should the English support such a vile underserving snake?

Joshua has been putting boxing on the map for the UK, A.J is the A-side.

[Shadoww702]

Whose name comes 1st? The one with the most belts in my opinion. Especially real ones.

So that would be Joshua.

Ring Magazine Belt belongs to Fury. Ain't no politics for that bekt.

Best the man that best the man...

So that would be Fury. Plus last I looked AJ has a LOSS

[Shadoww702]

They should call it "Joshua Fury' since Tyson is going to make him his son anyway

Good point.

Anthony "Joshua" Fury Jr.