Why are the best not constantly fighting the best in boxing?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Toffee
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2018
    • 7356
    • 2,545
    • 75
    • 62,824

    #11
    When good fights get made, fans declare the loser's career to be over. Call them outclassed and not elite. Then they criticise the winner saying the opponent was never really good enough.

    If your consumer's response to big fights is like that, why bother taking risks?

    The top guys can earn millions fighting carefully selected opponents instead of opponents who can negatively impact their earning potential.

    Basically, we get the fights we deserve.

    Comment

    • RespekonMyName
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 2795
      • 240
      • 12
      • 24,643

      #12
      Because people around the fighters, who have no skills themselves, have to milk these guys as long as possible. A defeat hurts earning potential.

      Comment

      • tonysoprano
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2017
        • 1919
        • 486
        • 1,115
        • 16,233

        #13
        Cos you can make the same money with 3-4 easy fights as you can with 1 tough one. Boxers don't want to risk their health.

        When the best fight the best you get wars. Benn/McClellan, Ali/Frazier. Those sort of fights shorten careers because you almost have to die to win them.

        Comment

        • Floyd is TBE
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2016
          • 3239
          • 737
          • 1,097
          • 27,507

          #14
          Bob Arum is usually the common denominator when it comes to big fights not getting made.

          Comment

          • Roy Keane
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 853
            • 31
            • 5
            • 13,639

            #15
            Embarrassing to have 4 world champions ��

            Comment

            • LA_2_Vegas
              Legendary Nights
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 7592
              • 663
              • 1,486
              • 33,333

              #16
              Seems more like a lot of people buy the marketing from the UFC that every guy who headlines a PPV and they give a ranking to becomes the "best" - they are the best for that PPV..how many guys have they gone through who were teh best for that PPV and had no staying power even though they were supposed to be the best?

              For example, Tank Davis fought LSC - hardcore boxing fans **** on the fight as say it's not the best vs the best even though LSC has been a top fighter for a long time ( i get the weight difference, I'm takling quality of fighter). Meanwhile, the same people who **** on LSC in that fight will come into a thread like this and tell people that guy Costa who fought Adesanya was the "best" - way better in his sport than Leo in boxing, right? We saw all his championship meddle in that fight - the guy was trash and looked like he never took a punch in his life.

              That fight was just another example of the UFC putting on the best while boxing puts on trash matchups like Teo-Loma or Fury-Wilde, yeah? I get that boxing has a lot of improvements that can be made but **** the sucking up of the UFC marketing is getting annoying
              Last edited by LA_2_Vegas; 01-04-2021, 06:47 PM.

              Comment

              • Blue54
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2017
                • 1220
                • 61
                • 8
                • 65,942

                #17
                Originally posted by LA_2_Vegas
                Seems more like a lot of people buy the marketing from the UFC that every guy who headlines a PPV and they give a ranking to becomes the "best" - they are the best for that PPV..how many guys have they gone through who were teh best for that PPV and had no staying power even though they were supposed to be the best?

                For example, Tank Davis fought LSC - hardcore boxing fans **** on the fight as say it's not the best vs the best even though LSC has been a top fighter for a long time ( i get the weight difference, I'm takling quality of fighter). Meanwhile, the same people who **** on LSC in that fight will come into a thread like this and tell people that guy Costa who fought Adesanya was the "best" - way better in his sport than Leo in boxing, right? We saw all his championship meddle in that fight - the guy was trash and looked like he never took a punch in his life.

                That fight was just another example of the UFC putting on the best while boxing puts on trash matchups like Teo-Loma or Fury-Wilde, yeah? I get that boxing has a lot of improvements that can be made but **** the sucking up of the UFC marketing is getting annoying
                If truly look at it Costa was the best lea in that division for the champion to fight. Adesanya Legit fought Romero, Gastelum and Whittaker back to back. The champs in UFC legit usually clean house and fight the 1 rank guy or top 5 ranked in the division each time they fight.
                While boxing champs usually fight a top 5 rank fighter in their division every 2 years.
                Davis been fighting on world champ level for 3 years now and only fought 2 top 5 ranked fighters in both division he fights in.

                Comment

                • Roadblock
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 14031
                  • 3,536
                  • 428
                  • 108,713

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Blue54
                  If truly look at it Costa was the best lea in that division for the champion to fight. Adesanya Legit fought Romero, Gastelum and Whittaker back to back. The champs in UFC legit usually clean house and fight the 1 rank guy or top 5 ranked in the division each time they fight.
                  While boxing champs usually fight a top 5 rank fighter in their division every 2 years.
                  Davis been fighting on world champ level for 3 years now and only fought 2 top 5 ranked fighters in both division he fights in.
                  UFC has one boss Boxing is totally different, thats why UFC fighters never make anywhere near what the top boxers make.

                  Comment

                  • Boxing-1013
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Sep 2017
                    • 6988
                    • 1,098
                    • 2,619
                    • 57,573

                    #19
                    Originally posted by RespekonMyName
                    Because people around the fighters, who have no skills themselves, have to milk these guys as long as possible. A defeat hurts earning potential.
                    This is a big part of it

                    Comment

                    • BoxingIsGreat
                      The Champ
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 19470
                      • 1,684
                      • 2,397
                      • 1,062,888

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Floyd is TBE
                      Bob Arum is usually the common denominator when it comes to big fights not getting made.
                      Best post so far. Green K.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP