He deserves his status as a top fighter but yes, he is quite overrated. The deck is always stacked in his favour and quite a few of his wins were against faded and/or smaller opponents. Against his best competition he has either lost (Mayweather, Golovkin x2) or narrowly won (Lara fight was razor thin, Jacobs).
Contrary to the peddled narrative, Golovkin actually boxed better in the rematch than the first fight. Canelo is given far too much extra credit simply because he didn't box off the back foot the entire fight. Instead, he was soundly outboxed at centre ring in a 117-111/116-112 type fight. Both bouts were clear wins for Golovkin, hence Canelo doing everything possible to prevent a trilogy meeting.
In short: top fighter but not all he's made out to be.
Contrary to the peddled narrative, Golovkin actually boxed better in the rematch than the first fight. Canelo is given far too much extra credit simply because he didn't box off the back foot the entire fight. Instead, he was soundly outboxed at centre ring in a 117-111/116-112 type fight. Both bouts were clear wins for Golovkin, hence Canelo doing everything possible to prevent a trilogy meeting.
In short: top fighter but not all he's made out to be.
Comment