Not particularly interested in the "he said, she said" back-and-forth in why Joshua- Wilder never happened. It didn't, like many other fights didn't, and things have moved on.
However, I do find it strange that, although the situation regarding how the various "world" titles are divided are the same, except the name of WBC champ is Fury not Wilder, Hearn and Joshua agree to a 50/50 split when they wouldn't even agree to 70/30 with Wilder?
However, I do find it strange that, although the situation regarding how the various "world" titles are divided are the same, except the name of WBC champ is Fury not Wilder, Hearn and Joshua agree to a 50/50 split when they wouldn't even agree to 70/30 with Wilder?
Comment