POLL: Should Saunders get major credit for his domination of Murray?

[STREET CLEANER]

He did what he had to do with the opponent that was presented to him. If he would had gone life and death with the guy he would get bashed for it also.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Considering that GGG doesn't get any credit for stopping Murray when Murray was 32 and in his prime?


No.

That's also a good counter point. Some more NSB hypocrisy.

So...


GGG dominates prime Murray - gets no credit.
Spence dominates prime Brook - gets no credit.


Crawford knocks out the ghost of Brook - P4P.
Saunders dominates the ghost of Murray....?


That's exactly what I'm exposing here.

[Scopedog]

He did exactly what was expected from him, no more, no less. No reason to hype him up any more or less than he was getting hyped up already. He's still slick and talented, and I presume he's still a massive ******.

[TMLT87]

Not MAJOR credit, but it was a very solid performance.

[Split Decision]

or show us something we didn't already know, he looks decent against less than sub-par competition

pretty sure bjs is the opposite of that

he fights better the better the opponent he usually struggles to impress against the lesser opponents

[_Rexy_]

pretty sure bjs is the opposite of that

he fights better the better the opponent he usually struggles to impress against the lesser opponents

That makes it sound like David Lemieux is a P4P fighter.

[Split Decision]

That makes it sound like David Lemieux is a P4P fighter.

does it ? weird as I never even mention lemiuix or p4p

so u dispute my point that bjs looks better with a better dance partner ?

[Madison Boxing]

when saunders beats a washed up fighter like murray he 'needs to up his opposition' but when crawford does it against khan and brook he is 'pound for pound'