Tweet
P4P is not - and should not - be based on resume
if any proof is required, then here it is...
FACT: having a better resume than Teofimo Lopez, did not help Lomachenko
FACT: knowledgeable people saw that coming... they knew
FACT: those knowledgeable people are the guys who should be making a P4P list
FACT: P4P is highly over-rated... P4P fighters lose all the time
P4P is not - and should not - be based on resume... and if any further proof is required, then simply check Cliff's list... and YES, it is a good list
if P4P was all about resume, Pacquiao would be ranked #1... but he did not even make the list
sorry... but this conversation - a conversation that we have EVERY MONTH, immediately following the P4P update - really is a little silly
ooops, nearly forgot to repeat the following fact, for emphasis...
FACT: P4P is highly over-rated... P4P fighters lose all the time
if any proof is required, then here it is...
FACT: having a better resume than Teofimo Lopez, did not help Lomachenko
FACT: knowledgeable people saw that coming... they knew
FACT: those knowledgeable people are the guys who should be making a P4P list
FACT: P4P is highly over-rated... P4P fighters lose all the time
P4P is not - and should not - be based on resume... and if any further proof is required, then simply check Cliff's list... and YES, it is a good list
if P4P was all about resume, Pacquiao would be ranked #1... but he did not even make the list
sorry... but this conversation - a conversation that we have EVERY MONTH, immediately following the P4P update - really is a little silly
ooops, nearly forgot to repeat the following fact, for emphasis...
FACT: P4P is highly over-rated... P4P fighters lose all the time
Comment