Tyson adored Maradona so much he dissed Messi

[BangEM]

LMAO. This nonce is talking about being on me, lol. I'm gonna lick off yer head, you lil pu...ssy. Just stop stalking me and leave all the little underaged girls alone.

I can't believe this idiot is arguing traditional positions in footy with me, especially when I played under the tutelage of some of the best grassroot footy coaches all over London growing up.

Just to educate you and anyone else interested in learning based on the prominent formations during the 90s and the 00s:

1. 4-3-3 Formation === 4 defenders, 3 midfielders (DM wearing no. 4, CM wearing 8 and AM wearing 10), 3 Forwards (2 wingers 7 x 11 and a traditional 9 playing through the middle).

2. 3-4-3 Formation === 3 defenders, 4 midfielders (the second centre back no. 6 would move up to support the DM, DM wearing no. 4, CM wearing 8 and AM wearing 10), 3 Forwards (2 wingers 7 x 11 and a traditional 9 playing through the middle).

3. 4-4-2 Formation === 4 defenders, 4 midfielders (DM wearing no. 4, CM wearing 8, AM wearing 10 and a winger dropping back to the midfield or a DM, a CM and 2 wingers in the midfield), 2 Forwards (2 strikers, or a traditional no. 10 and a striker with the no. 10 playing behind the striker, or a winger and a striker).

4. 5-3-2 Formation === 5 defenders with the DM dropping back just above the 4 traditional defenders, 3 midfielders (a CM or AM with 2 wingers) and two strikers.

5. 5-4-1 Formation === 5 defenders with the DM dropping back just above the 4 traditional defenders, 4 midfielders (a CM, AM with 2 wingers) and a striker.

It's only today that the diamond 4-2-3-1 has become prominent whereby there are 2 sitting midfielders and it allows the other 3 playing behind the lone striker to act as forwards and midfielders with more room to operate.

Don't argue football with me. I played the game and was just unlucky not to make it. Fcccking cu...nt. The delusional nonce of boxingscene - I'm on your case and it's my responsibility to protect underaged girls.

[BangEM]

Prime Ronaldo who played in Zidane era is better than messi. PRIME FOR PRIME. IT'S NOT EVEN CLOSE.

That's the real Ronaldo - the Brazilian one. He's better than Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo. Ronaldinho's also better than both.

[BangEM]

Ronaldinho is the most exciting player I've ever seen, an incredible player and the best in the world for a few years but his ability to win football matches again and again and again isn't on the same level as R9, CR7 or Messi to be honest.

Still my fav player ever outside of my own team. CR7/Messi don't have a weak era - that is ridiculous. They do play in more stacked domestic teams though, since the sport has changed and now the best players always gravitate to the top clubs. The rule change RE transfers impacted things greatly.

I doubt you watched prime Ronaldinho. Teams used to be scared of Barcelona. The guy just partied too much and got out of shape. But what he could do with the football - Messi and CR7 can only dream about doing it.

But the real Ronaldo (Brazilian Ronaldo) was the real deal - the 2nd greatest footballer I ever saw in my life. And he did it so effortlessly.

Messi and CR7 era is so weak, I doubt you can name 5 generational talents in their era. Who else apart from Messi and CR7? Iniesta? - he's not even fit to lace Seedorf's shoes? Robinho? LMAO. Xavi? - I don't even think he's better than Guardiola tbh, so comparing him to the great talents that played his position in the 90s and 00s would be a bit disrespectful. vNeymar?

However, in the other eras, it's pretty easy to name at least 10 generational talents. Even players from small countries like Bulgaria with Hristo Stoichkov ***** on any player not named Messi and Ronaldo in the 2010s era.

I'm just happy the standard/talent-level is ascending again with the talented kids growing through the ranks now. And it's going to be more competitive at the top again.

[BangEM]

Fair enough on Gravesen, although I'm also inclined to think there was Gravesen who played for Denmark and Tommy who played for Everton, if you see what I mean? Perhaps Toffee and/or RJJ GOAT can let me know if that's true or not.

Messi and Ronaldo overrated...I don't know. Personally, I'd take Ronaldinho over the pair of them but if we're taking longevity and stats into account, it paints a different picture.

As far as rivals go, there was Zlatan, Eto'o (criminally underrated imho), Drogba, Torres, Villa, Rooney, Aguero, Benzema, Higuain, Cavani...I'm sure you'll take issue with a few of those names, I do myself, but in the end they've got the numbers to back them up.

Gravesen played for Everton but was bought by Real Madrid. He's a Dane.

Eto and Drogba aren't really Messi and Ronaldo era. Eto was already on the decline (Eto was a star by age 21) when Messi and Ronaldo became superstars. And Drogba was in his 30s. It's basically like saying Messi and Ronaldo are Sancho, Haaland and Joao Felix are Messi and Ronaldo era. You could argue about the rest but I don't think they're generational talents apart from Aguero, Villa and Cavani who're marginal generation talents. However, they were (are) very good.

Anyway, I'll put Eto, Drogba and perhaps Villa in the Ronaldinho era.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

LMAO. This nonce is talking about being on me, lol. I'm gonna lick off yer head, you lil pu...ssy. Just stop stalking me and leave all the little underaged girls alone.

I can't believe this idiot is arguing traditional positions in footy with me, especially when I played under the tutelage of some of the best grassroot footy coaches all over London growing up.

Just to educate you and anyone else interested in learning based on the prominent formations during the 90s and the 00s:

1. 4-3-3 Formation === 4 defenders, 3 midfielders (DM wearing no. 4, CM wearing 8 and AM wearing 10), 3 Forwards (2 wingers 7 x 11 and a traditional 9 playing through the middle).

2. 3-4-3 Formation === 3 defenders, 4 midfielders (the second centre back no. 6 would move up to support the DM, DM wearing no. 4, CM wearing 8 and AM wearing 10), 3 Forwards (2 wingers 7 x 11 and a traditional 9 playing through the middle).

3. 4-4-2 Formation === 4 defenders, 4 midfielders (DM wearing no. 4, CM wearing 8, AM wearing 10 and a winger dropping back to the midfield or a DM, a CM and 2 wingers in the midfield), 2 Forwards (2 strikers, or a traditional no. 10 and a striker with the no. 10 playing behind the striker, or a winger and a striker).

4. 5-3-2 Formation === 5 defenders with the DM dropping back just above the 4 traditional defenders, 3 midfielders (a CM or AM with 2 wingers) and two strikers.

5. 5-4-1 Formation === 5 defenders with the DM dropping back just above the 4 traditional defenders, 4 midfielders (a CM, AM with 2 wingers) and a striker.

It's only today that the diamond 4-2-3-1 has become prominent whereby there are 2 sitting midfielders and it allows the other 3 playing behind the lone striker to act as forwards and midfielders with more room to operate.

Don't argue football with me. I played the game and was just unlucky not to make it. Fcccking cu...nt. The delusional nonce of boxingscene - I'm on your case and it's my responsibility to protect underaged girls.

Roma consistently played a 4-3-3 with Totti as the 9. You know f*** all about football. You were WRONG.

Italians essentially always play a 3, as they like to have a Regista, Mezzala and Trequartista. Totti and Del Piero never operated as any of 3 as they were forwards.

The 4-2-3-1 came about in the late 80’s. Man united played it regularly in Fergie’s early years. With McClair operating as the 10 behind Hughes.

You never nearly made it either... utter bullsh**.

And btw, hand the laptop in, we’re on to ya. Nonce...

[BangEM]

LMAOOO. This booty scratching nonce, man.

Even Totti’s profile said he’s primarily an attacking midfielder.

This helmet claims Totti played as no. 9 - I guess Cassano and Nonda were ball boys then, lol.

And the fact that this nonce compared Man Utd’s 4-2-3-1 of the 80 which was played like the 4-5-1 - to the prominent diamond 4-2-3-1 today, tells me all I need to know. What an idiot! LMAOOO

Stop trying to punch above yer height - you’re blockhead who tries to hard. And I’m still going to save little girls from you. When I find you, I shall lick off yer head, you de****able nonce. LMAOO

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Non credible sites like Wiki list him as an attacking midfielder. The fact you’re citing and had to use Wiki says it all. You don’t know sh**...

Nonda barely played for Roma. Another wiki search I’m guessing.

Real football databases like transfermarkt all recognise him as a forward.

United clearly played the 4-2-3-1.
Ince Robson
Phelan McClair Sharpe
Hughes

Hand the laptop in Nonce Em, we’re on to ya.

[BangEM]

You're a nonce with no life apart from stalking people on forum and preying on underaged girls (but I'll handle this and save the underaged girls.

No wasting my time on you anymore but I'll drop this here:



When I find you - it's a wrap. Pass the message to yer alt IDs and minions as well.

Being a nonce is a crime against humanity!

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

So some fantasy team picture with Totti on the right side of midfield is supposed to convince me.

Totti could operate as an attacking midfielder, he did it at times during Roma’s 00-01 season to help facilitate for Delvecchio and Batistuta. However, for the vast majority of his career Totti operated as a forward. As either a second striker or a number 9. Perrotta was the man who regularly played as the AM from Roma and did so for a decade.

World Cup final 2006. Biggest game of Totti’s career. Where did he play? In a two man strike partnership with Luca Toni.

You were wrong Nonce Em. Get over it. Hand that laptop in we’re on to ya.

[Dakuwaqa]

Meh football is proper boring. I can only get excited by fighting sports