Crawford-Brook ratings 6x higher than Spence-Brook
Collapse
-
-
300kish PPV buys against another huge name at 147 doesn't equate to A-side 60/40 status. Like not even close. It's honestly mind numbing that people think it does. Crawford did half of that in a completely irrelevant fight that no one wanted to see. The only guy at 147 at that status is PAC.Comment
-
Spence vs Brook was like at 3PM from the U.K on Showtime terrible comparison and doesn't change the fact that Crawford feasted on GGG and Spence leftovers from nearly 4 years agoComment
-
Those two fights were almost 4 years apart and Spence was not even a champion then. Spence was just starting to get a big name. Today Spence has a much bigger name and is a two belt holder who has defeated much better welterweights than Crawford has. Spence is a bigger draw than Crawford now and a bigger money maker.Comment
-
You don't even have to go a big comparison. One fight was on showtime and the other was on ESPN.Comment
-
It is terrible. But it’s better than comparing Mikey Garcia to Viktor Postol, which everyone here is doing while complaining about this comparison.
Comment
-
How do we know Spence is a bigger draw?
Those two fights were almost 4 years apart and Spence was not even a champion then. Spence was just starting to get a big name. Today Spence has a much bigger name and is a two belt holder who has defeated much better welterweights than Crawford has. Spence is a bigger draw than Crawford now and a bigger money maker.Comment
-
Comment