How is Crawford p4p number 1

[Ochoa780]

He isnt. Network nuthuggers only have him at 1

[Rusty Tromboni]

Lomachenko is still number 1... but quite a bit.

Fury, Usyk, Inoue and Lopez all slot in under him, and I think you can put Crawford in with them. He looked really good at 140, he just hasn't done much since then.

Following that, you can talk about guys like Spence, Canelo, Beterbiev.

Canelo is the P4P king and it's not close. Best resume in the game.

Hhahahaha! No.


Schooled by Floyd.

Embarassed by Lara.

Embarassed by Golovkin.

Fell short when seeking redemption.

Cherry-picked Kovalev, and ran like a ***** from Beterbiev.

[lolpz]

Literally garbage resume, lol.

[Larry the boss]

Canelo is clearly p4p #1

[sicko]

Canelo is #1 but Bud is Top 3

I think we should have people explain their Criteria for P4P before releasing a P4P Ranking

P4P is not a Ranking for fans to list their Top 10 Favorite fighters and that is what P4P has turned into or in ESPN Case, making P4P Rankings based on who fight on their Network

I always refer back to this very old video of B-Hop Definition of P4P:


Resume is just 1 OF the Criteria for P4P and while Bud Resume is not great at all, he does check off some of the other stuff as far as Boxing Skills, Defense among other things so yes he is ONE the best P4P today

[Larry the boss]

Lomachenko is still number 1... but quite a bit.

Fury, Usyk, Inoue and Lopez all slot in under him, and I think you can put Crawford in with them. He looked really good at 140, he just hasn't done much since then.

Following that, you can talk about guys like Spence, Canelo, Beterbiev.



Hhahahaha! No.


Schooled by Floyd.

Embarassed by Lara.

Embarassed by Golovkin.

Fell short when seeking redemption.

Cherry-picked Kovalev, and ran like a ***** from Beterbiev.

How is Loma p4p#1 and he clearly just lost?? seriously how?

[BrometheusBob.]

I like Crawford but yeah, definitely not #1.

Now I guess it has to be Canelo right? I'm kinda struggling to think of someone I'd put ahead of him. Usyk is up there too.

I would have said Loma until recently. I really didn't like how he looked in that fight. Maybe it was just too high a weight class to venture into.

[TheBoxGod]

He's definitely #2 or #3 so what reasons are you taking about?

(I think we all can agree that Canelo is #1 as it stands)

ESPN are in business with Top Rank, its a conflict of interest for them to even have a p4p list imo. They have too much to gain from claiming his p4p#1 which translate to more money for their network etc.

[BrometheusBob.]

ESPN are in business with Top Rank, its a conflict of interest for them to even have a p4p list imo. They have too much to gain from claiming his p4p#1 which translate to more money for their network etc.

Every time I see your profile pic I think it's Miguel Cotto for like 2 seconds

[RespekonMyName]

Lomachenko is still number 1... but quite a bit.

Fury, Usyk, Inoue and Lopez all slot in under him, and I think you can put Crawford in with them. He looked really good at 140, he just hasn't done much since then.

Following that, you can talk about guys like Spence, Canelo, Beterbiev.



Hhahahaha! No.


Schooled by Floyd.

Embarassed by Lara.

Embarassed by Golovkin.

Fell short when seeking redemption.

Cherry-picked Kovalev, and ran like a ***** from Beterbiev.

He's beaten GGG, Jacobs and Kovalev within the last two years. Nobody's touching that.