You guys always crap on GGG resume but crawfords resume is arguably worse and somehow he’s p4p number one?
How is Crawford p4p number 1
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
i have no idea, hes never fought a fighter above B level, doesnt even look that impressive eye test wise, struggled with the guy who was shot in the knee and some c level fighter dropped him last fight. Hides behind the top rank excuse saying he cant get fights yet it was his choice to resign with them. -
P4P is just an opinion based listing based on whoever is controlling the narrative..e.g. Ring Magazine is owned by GBP, and how does Canelo even make the top 5 in my opinion, when he has been gifted so many fights.
Terrence is highly rated because he was undisputed and his talent is just a different level and you can see that.Comment
-
-
I think every boxing fan has a right to their own pfp top 10 list arranged any way they want. I had Crawford very high PFP when he was at 140 because he was great at that weight and very dominant plus he completely cleaned out 140. When he moved up to 147 I did not think he was as good or dominant as he was at 140. The quality of his opponents was pretty bad and he too much trouble beating a couple of not very good challengers. He is 33 now and does not seem to be as good as he was at 140. I think Spence beats him and I have dropped him down to number 10 pfp on my list. As I said other posters can put him where ever they want PFP. It's their list.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment