Comments Thread For: Kell Brook: There's No Rehydration Clause In Contracts For Crawford Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mateuz asato
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Sep 2019
    • 154
    • 10
    • 1
    • 4,339

    #31
    Originally posted by fantasy5021
    LOL it doesnt matter. Kell is one of the most over rated boxers anyway. Who did he beat? Porter and.. LOL. Cool, he stepped up to the plate and lost to Earl Spence and GGG. Hes a C- fighter now.
    Well, Porter ain't a nobody

    Comment

    • Monty Fisto
      And still...
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2018
      • 3441
      • 1,467
      • 855
      • 22,690

      #32
      I've heard a lot of people say Brook has no chance at WW these days because he is weight drained making 147lbs.

      Now that he doesn't have a rehydration clause, people are dismissing it as unimportant, because of Crawford's speed and timing.

      Crawford does indeed have elite timing, but weight is such a crucial element of boxing that this news is significant. Not saying Brook will pull off the upset, but this definitely increases his chances.

      Comment

      • 4truth
        U can't handle the Truth
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2016
        • 15272
        • 4,151
        • 1,671
        • 197,686

        #33
        just because you are weight drained at 147 seven months after fighting at 160, doesn't mean you are still going to be weight drained 4 years later. It really depends on how Brook has been training.

        All things considered, the Spence fight at 147 seven months after fighting at 160 and also having facial surgery was a bigger mistake than fighting Golovkin.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP