Comments Thread For: Adrien Broner To Be Released From Jail, Must Comply With Court
Collapse
-
Comment
-
I always beat my meat to miss better..miss better at Franklin mickinley ?? Terrible school district. ****** azz pimps and playas got jobs there.
I sold weed from my dads grow room
I am nobody.
she filled fantasies for year. Beyoncé SelenaComment
-
I guess you did not notice all the (?) I left after each sentence. There is a reason I was asking so many questions because the article omits a lot of information.With all due respect you were not involved in the case. I'm not an expert on law and court cases but I doubt the system is as loose as you're painting it. You have no idea how much evidence was presented to the judge leading her to a default decision of 800k. You're acting like some random chick off the street decided it might be a good payday to sue Broner if he doesn't show up and "look at that, what do you know it worked". Some cases can be dismissed outright for lack of evidence. Most lawyers won't even take a case, especially against a celebrity like figure, unless there's a decent chunk of evidence.
Furthermore, you're also acting like the girl sued for "oh whatever amount I can get that's still a lot" and the judge said "oh i know 800k, does that work for you?". The chick likely sued for millions, in other words she picked the initial number not the judge. The judge likely looked at the evidence and awarded an amount based on the number the accuser picked because Broner not showing up is like admitting the accuser is right and that he accedes to whatever monetary amount she requested.
And lastly getting a notice for a court date for being sued is not like a traffic ticket that just comes the mail. Broner was likely served a summons which guarantees he knew about the court date. And even if he still didn't show up, he can probably still appeal the decision if can show he had good reason for not showing up. But it doesn't even seem like he tried that.Comment
-
But it is that easy. Look at all those guys who have had their college careers ruined because some psycho accused them of ****. Society rushes to believe women for any and everything before looking at the facts. Look at the whole Kavanaugh thing. There are people that still think he is guilty even though there has been numerous witnesses that where there that night that deny anything every happening.There’s no problem with that procedure. You’re also gonna be wasting your time and some money if you’re the accuser. If you’re the accused, you can avoid being charged 800k or any amount. All you have to do is to attend the court and contest accusations.
That woman wasn’t getting anything by accusations alone. It was Broner who helped her get what she wanted by sheer laziness and ******ity.
You can’t just accuse anybody and expect you can just get something back immediately without proving and winning and it’s also a waste of resource as I mentioned earlier. Which means, it’s not THAT EASY. Broner MADE IT EASY for the woman
Gets?Comment
-
That’s what you call - you gotta EDUCATE yourself if you don’t wanna look ignorant with the society. Broner can’t be excused with that. He had money after all.But it is that easy. Look at all those guys who have had their college careers ruined because some psycho accused them of ****. Society rushes to believe women for any and everything before looking at the facts. Look at the whole Kavanaugh thing. There are people that still think he is guilty even though there has been numerous witnesses that where there that night that deny anything every happening.
Ignorance of the law excuses no oneComment
-
I am not defending Broner in the slightest. I am going after the justice department and society that enables this type of outcome. Broner has only himself to blame. He has been caught on video hitting a woman and has done who knows what else. My point was that because he failed to show that woman now is awarded a huge amount of money for a kiss. Unless she has video proof of it happening, it is still a she said he said thing.Comment
-
Well, if he knew the court of laws, he should have known that not attending a court order means acceptance of guilt. That itself is a proof. It's a default verdict.I am not defending Broner in the slightest. I am going after the justice department and society that enables this type of outcome. Broner has only himself to blame. He has been caught on video hitting a woman and has done who knows what else. My point was that because he failed to show that woman now is awarded a huge amount of money for a kiss. Unless she has video proof of it happening, it is still a she said he said thing.
If he didn't know, it only supports what I said earlier. He should EDUCATE himself to avoid screwing up himself.Comment
-
Yes, yes, yes I understand all of that. I am not defending him nor his actions. I am questioning our legal system. Instead of the woman automatically being awarded money Broner should be jailed and brought in to court so that the Judge hears both sides. Him not showing up should not automatically be an admittance of guilt.Well, if he knew the court of laws, he should have known that not attending a court order means acceptance of guilt. That itself is a proof. It's a default verdict.
If he didn't know, it only supports what I said earlier. He should EDUCATE himself to avoid screwing up himself.Comment
Comment