What if Deontay Wilder is right?

[champion4ever]

It might be different if they had the suspected object in their possession.

Their options here are:

1. A fist in a glove.
2. A fist and 'something else unseen by everyone and never appearing on cameras' in a glove.

I don't think they'll be drawing any meaningful conclusions. Especially not 8 months after the fact.

No, he is only suing that Fury had committed a tortious act against him so a statute of limitations is irrelevant and the burden proof is much lower.

Wilder just have to prove that a preponderance of the evidence shows that an injury had indeed occurred. In other words, it was more likely than not that Fury had indeed tampered his gloves to deliberately injure Deontay Wilder.

It's not a guilty beyond a reasonable doubt case.

[DaNeutral.]

Do that frighten you Wilder haters? If history proves that Wilder was right all along that Fury is indeed a born liar and a proven cheat then what?

What if Deontay Wilder is vindicated? Would you guys then have the moral courage to admit that you were wrong for doubting him?

God no, if it turned out to be true I'd expect serious legal stuff going on, I'd hope every guilty party to get shafted, banned, fined or even jailed.

But then there is more chance that Tom Cruises alien God and a flat earth has a higher probability rate than all those things happening. Especially the Mark Breland bit.

[champion4ever]

God no, if it turned out to be true I'd expect serious legal stuff going on, I'd hope every guilty party to get shafted, banned, fined or even jailed.

But then there is more chance that Tom Cruises alien God and a flat earth has a higher probability rate than all those things happening. Especially the Mark Breland bit.

Good, that's very comforting to hear. However, the Mark Breland bit was stated only as an opinion not fact. The Tyson Fury bit was stated as a fact. So we are all awaiting to hear from him to see how he refutes these allegations.

[DaNeutral.]

Good, that's very comforting to hear. However, the Mark Breland bit was stated only as an opinion not fact. The Tyson Fury bit was stated as a fact. So we are all awaiting to hear from him to see how he refutes these allegations.

He already has, he laughed and said they were ridiculous. So we are all waiting to hear from Wilder with some proof. We need that autopsy report for starters.

[removed]

Do that frighten you Wilder haters? If history proves that Wilder was right all along that Fury is indeed a born liar and a proven cheat then what?

What if Deontay Wilder is vindicated? Would you guys then have the moral courage to admit that you were wrong for doubting him?

You need to hook me up with your weed dealer bro.

[Bandman]

Wilder goin out sad smh.

i remember not long ago he wanted to catch bodies and kill mofos. thats the wilder i miss lol

[BirdSong]

i have no doubt fury is a liar and a cheat & would do stuff if he could get away with it, that's how gypsie's roll, but i don't think he's done all that stuff, does he mess with his glove's, sure he does, is he trying to get an advantage, definitely, that first fight he had a funny looking glove action and he probably slapped wilder a few time's, he fight's rough too at time's too but he's not low blowing rabbit punching any more than wilder etc and he's not headbutting putting his opponent in danger, sorry wilder u just got beat, train up and do better next time, wilder can definitely do better than II

[Toffee]

No, he is only suing that Fury had committed a tortious act against him so a statute of limitations is irrelevant and the burden proof is much lower.

Wilder just have to prove that a preponderance of the evidence shows that an injury had indeed occurred. In other words, it was more likely than not that Fury had indeed tampered his gloves to deliberately injure Deontay Wilder.

It's not a guilty beyond a reasonable doubt case.

He's not sued him. It's not a legal case.

But if it was... what I said would still apply. Balance of probabilities says it was a fist and not a complete mystery object.

[champion4ever]

He already has, he laughed and said they were ridiculous. So we are all waiting to hear from Wilder with some proof. We need that autopsy report for starters.

When? I must have missed it. As far as an autopsy report; He doesn't need it. He has the forensics, the receipts and the documents to prove his case. As I've stated earlier; Wilder has the goods on him buddy! Which is why he is laying so low key. He is afraid of what the Bronze Bomber next move may be

[champion4ever]

He's not sued him. It's not a legal case.

But if it was... what I said would still apply. Balance of probabilities says it was a fist and not a complete mystery object.

Well, that's why there are trials. In order to search for the truth.