What if Deontay Wilder is right?

[NYG]

***** must have blocked me. ****ing loser just like Wilder is

[boliodogs]

Do that frighten you Wilder haters? If history proves that Wilder was right all along that Fury is indeed a born liar and a proven cheat then what?

What if Deontay Wilder is vindicated? Would you guys then have the moral courage to admit that you were wrong for doubting him?

Yes I would if that happens but it won't happen. Wilder is a crybaby and a sore loser.

[champion4ever]

How the **** can a doctor possibly prove something was in Fury's glove. I mean think about it

Through forensic science; They can reasonably deduce the cause of an injury and the type of object that was used to commit said injury. Tyson Fury could possibly face a criminal prosecution if Team Wilder can prove that a blunt force object was used in causing his injuries.

[champion4ever]

Yes I would if that happens but it won't happen. Wilder is a crybaby and a sore loser.

Thanks, that's fair enough. I can respect that position.

[kafkod]

Do that frighten you Wilder haters? If history proves that Wilder was right all along that Fury is indeed a born liar and a proven cheat then what?

What if Deontay Wilder is vindicated? Would you guys then have the moral courage to admit that you were wrong for doubting him?

And what if history doesn't prove that Wilder was right all along?

What if he is never vindicated?

How long will you keep supporting him and believing his nonsense without any proof at all?

[LoadedWraps]

Do that frighten you Wilder haters? If history proves that Wilder was right all along that Fury is indeed a born liar and a proven cheat then what?

What if Deontay Wilder is vindicated? Would you guys then have the moral courage to admit that you were wrong for doubting him?

Right about what?

The delusional accusations with no logic nor evidence?

This is one of those times when its appropriate to use the following term: impossible.

[champion4ever]

Right about what?

The delusional accusations with no logic nor evidence?

This is one of those times when its appropriate to use the following term: impossible.

Ok, we will see. Only time will reveal. All I know is that Wilder felt that he was done dirty by Tyson Fury and wants justice from him or some type of legal remedy against him one.

[MoneyKasha]

Ok, we will see. Only time will reveal. All I know is that Wilder felt that he was done dirty by Tyson Fury and wants justice from him or some type of legal remedy against him one.

Wilder has a sub 80 iq that believed Mark Breland was a secret double agent for Fury and that he poisoned his water.... don’t take everything he says seriously

[Real King Kong]

Firstly, I don't think he can be proven right. A hundred things happened according to Wilder and not one has any kind of substance. The odds are massively against him proving anything there.

Secondly, not for one second do I think Tyson Fury wouldn't cheat if given the opportunity. So it's nothing to do with that. There's no-one in boxing that I trust that much.

This all about Wilder. Even if something happened in the future with Fury that made people wonder if Deontay was right after all, I'd still not respect Wilder's approach. The right approach would be to take the trilogy fight and put in place more oversight of the gloves and everything else. Instead he let it expire and then cried in the media. That's not the behaviour of a champion.

What did Arguello do v Pryor? And there was some actual substance in the allegations against Panama Lewis. He never complained, he just ran it back. Ultimately he took a fight that would prove who was the better fighter, and deserves massive respect for that.

Tyson Fury wouldn't take water from anyone in the build up to the rematch. Remember that? You learn, and you avoid the things that can cause problems.

I wonder what AJ's excuses were after Ruiz? He never looked right. How easy would it be to throw shade at Ruiz instead of owning the defeat? Instead he just took the rematch, never made excuses and set about making adjustments.

Regardless of anything else, Wilder is in the wrong here.

Well put. Fury is in his head and he lost his damn mind. If he believes he’s the better man, which apparently he doesn’t, he could get him in the 3rd fight fair and square and prove it.

[champion4ever]

Wilder has a sub 80 iq that believed Mark Breland was a secret double agent for Fury and that he poisoned his water.... don’t take everything he says seriously

Thanks, I very much appreciate that. However, I still don't know how that absolves Fury from any of his alleged wrongdoings. If he did it.