Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

When Gennady Golovkin is unstoppable in the ring...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by boliodogs View Post
    Check the record before you say ****** incorrect BS about a good champion, GGG hater. He only has one loss and that was a Vegas robbery loss to Canelo that the majority of viewers thought GGG won. He beat Canelo twice and got Vegas robbed twice. he was ring magazine's number 1 pound for pound for over three years in a row and that is longer than anyone fighting today.
    Exactly, hence, “loses”. Because, he lost.

    Is English your first language?

    Golovkin wasn’t Ring Magazine #1 for 3 years in a row That’s a lie.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Rick Taylor View Post
      stop ducking the question coward
      I just answered your question. Can you read?

      The answer was “No, not at all”

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Vlad_ View Post
        So he did beat the so called best in Canelo. Then isn't he the actual best?
        I have them 1-1 but both were close either way fights so I won’t argue with either decision.

        But regardless if you had him winning both they were still close fights and far from “unstoppable”

        Which has been the same story with the other two top fighters he’s faced in Jacobs and Derevenchko.

        You could argue he lost to all 3.

        Personally I had him beating Canelo and losing to Jacobs and Derevenchko but can’t argue with any of the decisions.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
          No I mean loses.
          Don't talk silly.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
            Canelo and Jacobs were clearly close fights.
            Yup! But that idiot says those easy!

            GGG won both by at least 13-14 rounds.

            That clown worse than Byrd and Lederman

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
              Unstoppable......against bums.

              Sc****s decisions or loses against Top ranked guys.
              Loses, illegitimately past his prime is more like it.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Sctrojan View Post
                Theres a reason canelo gave up the WBC belt instead of facing triple G in '16...and it wasn't because of sanctioning fees and not being a true "middleweight" as he claimed....that triple G would've wrecked canelo and any other middleweight at that time.
                lol. He didn't fight in 2016 but then fought him in 2017. Hey is Bowe vs Lewis still happening? Yeah GGG would've ''wrecked'' Canelo a year before sure...

                GGG fans sad their idol didn't show up against Canelo, and they're content with his mediocre performance as well with his worst compubox to date

                Comment


                • #58
                  I never understood why GGG fans actually try to justify his performance as a robbery. Moretti and Trella had it close. Too bad Moretti hadn't scored it 114-114. the GGG girls wouldn't have brought up Byrd since it wouldn't have mattered. I thought Moretti was being generous and GGG never won wide considering Canelo's tactics will be studied for generations from that fight!

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                    No, not really.

                    I think Golovkin won aswell but the fight was clearly an either way fight.
                    HUH? lol

                    You literally contradicted yourself!

                    I think you lack the ability for rational thinking

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                      Canelo and Jacobs were clearly close fights.
                      Competitive, yes. Did they only have one winner, yes. Can't get to 6 rounds for Canelo or Jacobs in those 3 unless you are giving them rounds they weren't in. When you outland a guy by about 50 punches, and in about 9 of the rounds (as GGG more or less did in those 3 fights), I mean the stats back up the story that were competitive but not close as far as scoring.

                      To put it this way, if GGG fought those guys' fights, and they fought his in those fights, no one who is saying they were close fights would be saying that now. They would be saying GGG got dominated and lost all 3. Which didn't happen, they were competitive. But the point is that a lot of people see red when they see GGG, they don't analyze his fights well at all.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP