Originally posted by Terr225
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Arum: I'll Explain Financial Implications Of Rematch To Lopez, Loma; Up To Them
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Squared.Circle View Post"Defeated Lomachenko convincingly"...he didn't though, did he? Beating somebody convincingly is something like Mayweather vs. Canelo. López didn't win the first six rounds because he was convincingly beating Loma, he won the first six rounds because Loma did fúck all. Look what happened when Loma actually started fighting; he won five out of six rounds in the latter half. So of course López doesn't want a rematch, he knows the strategy would be different and he'd get spanked lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostAlso, if a punch lands so softly that it doesn't impact the fighter, why would it be considered effective in professional scoring? Its not a touch contest.
You land or you don't.
It's a jab or a power shot.
In terms of LANDED SHOTS, it was a chess match.
In terms of POWER SHOTS, it was a chess match.
Both guys landed some and missed some.
That's a swing round.
All you care about is that ONE body shot - which is called out in the video I shared - and nothing else because the video clearly shows that at most, Lopez might have landed 3 body shots the whole round.
You don't win a fight or even a round from one punch that doesn't wobble or drop your opponent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Thunderstruck View PostYeah right.The rounds he decided to throw punches Loma fans Want to give him every round.He did his Mikey Garcia tribute for the first six rounds because Lopez was nailing his ass hard especially with those body shots.He was on his way to getting knocked on his ass before that head butt in the 12th.López landed about three decent punches in the first half.
López didn't dominate or put on a masterclass performance, not by a long shot. López' successes came from Lomachenko's poor showing. Sorry folks, but that's just the raw truth of it.
López would be wise to avoid an on point Loma, as well as steering clear of Haney (the legitimate undisputed fight. Let's get that straight). This whole "López is the next Mayweather type, dominant superstar of boxing" is gonna go the same way it did for Devon Alexander...no where lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by revelated View PostAs I've said repeatedly...there is NO FORCE METRIC in scoring.
You land or you don't.
It's a jab or a power shot.
In terms of LANDED SHOTS, it was a chess match.
In terms of POWER SHOTS, it was a chess match.
Both guys landed some and missed some.
That's a swing round.
All you care about is that ONE body shot - which is called out in the video I shared - and nothing else because the video clearly shows that at most, Lopez might have landed 3 body shots the whole round.
You don't win a fight or even a round from one punch that doesn't wobble or drop your opponent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Squared.Circle View PostWhat fight was you watching?López landed about three decent punches in the first half.
López didn't dominate or put on a masterclass performance, not by a long shot. López' successes came from Lomachenko's poor showing. Sorry folks, but that's just the raw truth of it.
López would be wise to avoid an on point Loma, as well as steering clear of Haney (the legitimate undisputed fight. Let's get that straight). This whole "López is the next Mayweather type, dominant superstar of boxing" is gonna go the same way it did for Devon Alexander...no where lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostWhy was Loma unable to carry the presumed dominance of rounds 8-11 into the 12th?
I'll say again, López' W is credited to Loma's poor showing in the first half, not López' imaginary dominance throughout the fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostIn professional boxing there is a force metric. Its called who landed the cleaner punches and who took the worse of the round.
A jab to the body is considered a power shot because it wasn't a jab upstairs. Doesn't mean that it was any more or less "forceful" than a standard straight to the body at full extension.
You will not find a single RULE BOOK that quotes a "force" metric anywhere. Period.
You can duck the video I shared all you want, the fact is, neither guy was dominant in Round 12. It could have gone either way.
I don't care if people want to gift Lopez the round for general activity or # of punches (Which is a flawed metric). Point is he didn't "decisively" win that round.
And when you take away Round 12, that means 5 rounds to Loma.
Meaning a CLOSE fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by revelated View PostAs I've said repeatedly...there is NO FORCE METRIC in scoring.
You land or you don't.
It's a jab or a power shot.
In terms of LANDED SHOTS, it was a chess match.
In terms of POWER SHOTS, it was a chess match.
Both guys landed some and missed some.
That's a swing round.
All you care about is that ONE body shot - which is called out in the video I shared - and nothing else because the video clearly shows that at most, Lopez might have landed 3 body shots the whole round.
You don't win a fight or even a round from one punch that doesn't wobble or drop your opponent.
Why do you keep making anti Lopez threads? Useless, anyone who ever disagreed with you about anything you have on ignore. Waste of time.
Comment
Comment