What does Pacquiao have that Lomachenko doesn't?

[pasawayako]

Lolololololololololol...... I asked for that.

I know you're a clown you don't need to say it.

[Noelanthony]

If you are a gifted fighter you will be undefeated just like floyd who was always given a gift decision win.

Whilst Pac was on the end of some bad decisions. Who was that Australian teacher he lost to again ?

[Tails]

First thing is that Lomachenko is not 5'7". That is Thurman's height more or less.

Pacquiao is also a lot more muscular and stronger than Lomachenko. Pacquiao was kind of drained at 135 from what I recall.

Pacquiao has a lot more power to keep people off of him for being a smaller man. Emphasis on a lot more power. That makes all the difference.

Plus Pacquiao gets criticized for his skillset but he actually is one of the smarter fighters in the game. He wouldn't still be winning way past his physical prime if he didn't have some boxing iq on when to turn it up and when to ease off the pedal.

[just the facts]

You can claim that floyd beat pac easily everyday of your life but you can't deny the video that show that pac beat floyd and also you can't deny that almost every boxing aficionados are agreeing that floyd is a cherry picker.

Also don't forget that floyd admit to himself that he is a coward.

The only problem with your reasoning is that it’s a lie. The video clearly shows that Floyd EASILY beat your hero and your undying man love will never change that.

Floyd’s a cherry picker? That must be why he chose to fight Pac. Floyd knew it would be an easy fight for him and it was.

[hugh grant]

Floyd’s a cherry picker? That must be why he chose to fight Pac. Floyd knew it would be an easy fight for him and it was.

Yes it was a cherry pick. Fighting a 70 fight former flyweight not far removed from a ko loss is aalways a cherry pick.
But it's a cherry pick with unsatisfactory result with controversy of Iv and bad shoulder and no rematch let alone triology

[just the facts]

Yes it was a cherry pick. Fighting a 70 fight former flyweight not far removed from a ko loss is aalways a cherry pick.
But it's a cherry pick with unsatisfactory result with controversy of Iv and bad shoulder and no rematch let alone triology

So Floyd is so much better than Pac that making a fight with him is a cherry pick? Ok if you say so.

[IAMTHAT]

I like Loma, my current favorite boxer, but he can’t touch Pacquiao

[IAMTHAT]

Lomachenko is a BMW, Pacquiao is a Ferrari.

What’s Ali?

[IAMTHAT]

First thing is that Lomachenko is not 5'7". That is Thurman's height more or less.

Pacquiao is also a lot more muscular and stronger than Lomachenko. Pacquiao was kind of drained at 135 from what I recall.

Pacquiao has a lot more power to keep people off of him for being a smaller man. Emphasis on a lot more power. That makes all the difference.

Plus Pacquiao gets criticized for his skillset but he actually is one of the smarter fighters in the game. He wouldn't still be winning way past his physical prime if he didn't have some boxing iq on when to turn it up and when to ease off the pedal.

Pacquiao is the man, one of the greats ... how is this even a conversation?

[4truth]

Loma uses technique to look faster than he really is. Pac is/was just plain fast. That and the obvious, power.