What does Pacquiao have that Lomachenko doesn't?
Collapse
-
-
-
Comment
-
You can make ignorant and false posts about Floyd everyday for the rest of your life if you chose but it won’t change a thing. Floyd EASILY beat your hero and your undying man love will never change that. Get the f^ck over it already.Comment
-
Comment
-
Manny Pacquiao has far less "skills" than Vasyl Lomachenko.
Loma-Greatest Amateur of all time, 396-1, Olympic/WC Golds.
Pacquiao- No Amateur experience, started with no real trainer, poor nutrition, etc.
Loma- 5ft7, talented boxer/athlete since childhood
Pacquiao- 5ft5, admits having “no talent” as a boxer
Loma-Textbook skills, defense, footwork, accuracy, ring IQ, etc.
Pacquiao- Crude slugger for most of his career, went through bloody wars and got hit/rocked often.
And Yet......
Pacquiao manages to go through division after division, win countless fights as an underdog, beat bigger fighters and legends, give us performances of a lifetime, and last year at age 40 beat a young lion in spectacular fashion.
Loma however seems to have hit his ceiling at 135lbs. Loses to a 23 year old with 15 fights after giving away the first 6 rounds.
So my question is: What does Manny Pacquiao have, that Lomachenko doesn't?Comment
-
Also don't forget that floyd admit to himself that he is a coward.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
No losses, takes him fewer rounds to suss his opponent out. I think 4 rounds is his maximum, not 7 rounds.
Floyd was not 26 years beating up on 17/18 year old amateurs.
Floyd secured his bag
Floyd regularly fought bigger fighters and went through 5 weight divisions
In any case Loma is a great fighter and I throughly enjoyed his run, well since his first defeat. It was just a bridge too far in Lopez but he has a champion mindset and he will bounce straight back but in the lower divisions I’m afraid to say. There is still some good fights for him at 130Comment
Comment