Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Arum On Loma-Lopez: I Don't Believe In Rematch Clauses; Overused By Hearn

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Clegg View Post
    Arum had a rematch clause for Crawford-Khan and even Robiesy Ramirez pro debut
    he had an actual clause for ramirez's pro debut? are you sure on that? just because he got a rematch doesnt mean there was a clause...not saying youre wrong just hard to believe....its easy for him to get a quick rematch because the guy he lost to was basically a nobody that didnt have a ton going for him......

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Inspired View Post
      yeh because both guys are in his stable, so he doesnt care about a rematch clause.
      if it was loma vs a matchroom fighter, def would have a rematch clause.
      That's exactly what I think

      Comment


      • #33
        Well, well, well... Teo has no idea what he’s in for! He may be young and strong but he’s also untested at a high level. Loma was seasoned before he turned pro and will dismantle, decimate and destroy Lopez and his father's dream! No rematch will be needed.

        Comment


        • #34
          Hearn is the new Al Haymon! LMAO! Everytime Arum gets a mic, he's going in on Hearn! I never understood why you have to talk about the next man, or fights you're not involved with? Just hype the fights you're making! Talking about DuBois vs. Joyce, or Usyk vs. Chisora, is not making Crawford vs. Brook more appealing!

          Comment


          • #35
            Clauses or not, Pacman, with Arum, had seven fights against the same two guys. Arum is lying.

            Comment


            • #36
              The BobFather aka Top Ranked Rematches ladies and gentlemen!

              I want some of that good high end kush that Bob be smoking!

              Comment


              • #37
                Rematch clauses should not be allowed in world championship fights whether they are mandatory or voluntary defences.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Agree with Arum here.
                  If wasn't for re-match clause for Wilder/Fury III, we could be watching AJ/Fury unification.

                  Re-matches can get made if both parties consent later on.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by OhG View Post
                    Arum, is full of bull**** anymore!!! A white man outfit Top Rank, everyone in that office has never even hit a bag in there lifetime much less put on a pair of Boxing gloves! Top Rank has made a fortune on the backs, sweat,blood an tears of latino and black fighters! I'm far from being racist!! FACTS are FACTS!!!
                    Nah you're racist bro.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by revelated View Post
                      Fairly certain he wrote a rematch clause for Manny if he lost against Horn.

                      Which of course, Manny ducked that rematch, but still, there was a clause.
                      I don't think that's true man.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP