Would Usyk school a prime "Big George" Foreman

[satiev1]

If you think usyk beats a prime foreman give up on the sport of boxing. It's not for you.

[Ascended]

If you think usyk beats a prime foreman give up on the sport of boxing. It's not for you.

No if you see george landing on usyk your a crazy idiot who needs glasses and if that was a slick diss to me I dont think anything I see Usyk movement and skill and I explained what I see from him and george if you wanna say stuff to me say it direct no slick dissing cause I insult you crazy people as a whole its always direct

George couldnt hit ali often until he was on the ropes but he is some way able to hit a person who moves way better then that ali yea that makes sense you idiot try watching matches of george more

[Marchegiano]

Im not making any claims you crazy idiot its visual try watching and ill say what I see and I dont see a slow easy to read george who would would look foolish with a 60s ali most like I said always said that ali would make George look bad so explain how a more fancy less flawed better defensive Usyk is hit by george like I said it doesnt add up

Oh your going off of name popularity only well that doesn't work with me if george had better reflexes and defense yea I would argee with you i have no problem with that

Now i wIll say a old george who yea he was slower then his young self which was slow he was way tougher for shots and was a picker and his weight helped intimate combined with like i said how super tough he was is a problem for even Usyk this is as much as you will get me to say george is a problem and he had real defense
I can't help you see the young george had the flaws I said your vision is bad

This guy

Listen, bud, pal, chill with the eye bull****. Despite not agreeing with you, like ever, you do this so much I'm going to give you some real advice; no one here respects your eye test anymore than you respect anyone else's.

You argue like you just started watching boxing. That's the ****ing truth. I don't even have anything to say about your opinion here I'm just tired of seeing you noob up the forum and no one pity you enough to say hey, that's a bad idea.

Well, unless you like being taken as a clown no one respects. If that's the case, my bad and carry on.

You're one of the most bias posters on the forum and worse than that alone you carry it on your sleeve. Ain't no one even needs to look for and prove any pattern with you, you just tell them your opinions are mostly based on what you see.




All sports are visual. All sports love stats. TF are all sports in love with stats for if all you need to do is watch? Maybe think about it a bit before you get defensive and tell me to **** myself. I'm not telling you to change your opinions, I'm telling you to back that **** with more than "watch it doe". Mook.

[Ascended]

This guy

Listen, bud, pal, chill with the eye bull****. Despite not agreeing with you, like ever, you do this so much I'm going to give you some real advice; no one here respects your eye test anymore than you respect anyone else's.

You argue like you just started watching boxing. That's the ****ing truth. I don't even have anything to say about your opinion here I'm just tired of seeing you noob up the forum and no one pity you enough to say hey, that's a bad idea.

Well, unless you like being taken as a clown no one respects. If that's the case, my bad and carry on.

You're one of the most bias posters on the forum and worse than that alone you carry it on your sleeve. Ain't no one even needs to look for and prove any pattern with you, you just tell them your opinions are mostly based on what you see.




All sports are visual. All sports love stats. TF are all sports in love with stats for if all you need to do is watch? Maybe think about it a bit before you get defensive and tell me to **** myself. I'm not telling you to change your opinions, I'm telling you to back that **** with more than "watch it doe". Mook.

Well you can tell me to change my opinion but I keep telling you people I don't talk from that

How am I bias for telling the truth im the most raw person on here

i was just asked how is wlad more skilled then joe and bill and explained every detail and explained how wlad was more skilled and was told all he had is reach and more patient when I said more then that

Nobody here can show any proof over what I said at 650 today afternoon its on this same page

[Marchegiano]

Well you can tell me to change my opinion but I keep telling you people I don't talk from that

How am I bias for telling the truth im the most raw person on here

i was just asked how is wlad more skilled then joe and bill and explained every detail and explained how wlad was more skilled and was told all he had is reach and more patient when I said more then that

Nobody here can show any proof over what I said at 650 today afternoon its on this same page

Reread it, I literally told you do not change your opinion but do change your presentation.

The bias line is funny as ****. You did that on purpose? It's a good joke right? Like when someone says can you forget about it and you respond with forget about what, right?

[Noelanthony]

Well you can tell me to change my opinion but I keep telling you people I don't talk from that

How am I bias for telling the truth im the most raw person on here

i was just asked how is wlad more skilled then joe and bill and explained every detail and explained how wlad was more skilled and was told all he had is reach and more patient when I said more then that

Nobody here can show any proof over what I said at 650 today afternoon its on this same page

How am i bias for telling the truth? just because you believe it doesn't mean its the truth.... USYK has superior defence which to be fair im not debating but short armed , flat footed no jab, Chisora was able to touch him so without seeing Foreman and USYK actually visually fight you want to factually tell me Usyk destroys him.? you are an idiot, no debating

[Noelanthony]

Im not making any claims you crazy idiot its visual try watching and ill say what I see and I dont see a slow easy to read george who would would look foolish with a 60s ali most like I said always said that ali would make George look bad so explain how a more fancy less flawed better defensive Usyk is hit by george like I said it doesnt add up

Oh your going off of name popularity only well that doesn't work with me if george had better reflexes and defense yea I would argee with you i have no problem with that

Now i wIll say a old george who yea he was slower then his young self which was slow he was way tougher for shots and was a picker and his weight helped intimate combined with like i said how super tough he was is a problem for even Usyk this is as much as you will get me to say george is a problem and he had real defense
I can't help you see the young george had the flaws I said your vision is bad

I'm not making no claims he says. do you read what you write??....... even here you are making the claim usyk is more fancy , less flawed and better defensive fighter than Ali. anyway thats another argument. Keep deep throating usyk you turd. suck it easy

[hugh grant]

Foreman is intimidating and a great heavyweight in the era of supposedly strong heavyweights. Everything says foreman should win but I'll cheekily say usyk wins.
But foreman not as big as you think he is.. He always looks big

[Ascended]

Foreman is intimidating and a great heavyweight in the era of supposedly strong heavyweights. Everything says foreman should win but I'll cheekily say usyk wins.
But foreman not as big as you think he is.. He always looks big

Where does being slow easy to read and needing to hit a standing target often to land shots often

Show you he hits a person who moves alot who has great use of angles and who isnt slow of hand which match cause i explained the match with joe ken and he lost to Ali and jim