There isn't? Then that is for dumb motherfuckers. It should be because this is a title unification bout. This is not a mandatory challenge or defense.
Comments Thread For: Teofimo Lopez: There's No Rematch Clause In Contracts For Lomachenko Fight
Collapse
-
-
Man, power is not enough to beat the IQ, footwork and speed. It will be clear 30 seconds into the fight that it is a mismatch. No need for the rematch.Comment
-
But Loma might see the justice in that if he were to lose so it is what it is...or it's simply cuz these mfers had such a rough time coming to an agreement that throwing in a rematch clause was gonna be more problematic than helpful in making the fight.Comment
-
Agree it's a dumb business move, but they are with the same outfit so a rematch seems highly doable if Teo wins. Loma is just fooking himself out of guaranteed money by not getting it included.
But Loma might see the justice in that if he were to lose so it is what it is...or it's simply cuz these mfers had such a rough time coming to an agreement that throwing in a rematch clause was gonna be more problematic than helpful in making the fight.Comment
-
Comment
-
??? really!! Not saying Loma will loose, but Walters better, interesting point of view. Walter's had his best performance by far when he won his belt, but nothing impressive before or after except the pig punch with a mediocre delivery and not very fast for the weight class.
50/50 fight in my book. Reminds me a bit of Hagler vs Leonard. If no one gets KOd this will one that could be debated for a while.Comment
-
The rematch clauses are things agreed to by the fighters before the fight. That's it. Loma never inquired the fight's rematch clause before and Lopez is not an exception.Comment
Comment