There isn't? Then that is for dumb motherfuckers. It should be because this is a title unification bout. This is not a mandatory challenge or defense.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Teofimo Lopez: There's No Rematch Clause In Contracts For Lomachenko Fight
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by JonDelPrado View PostNo rematch means loma’s people not remotely concerned about losing. But they’d be better served approaching this fight with caution. He’s got enough power and precision to be a real threat
Comment
-
Originally posted by champion4ever View PostThere isn't? Then that is for dumb motherfuckers. It should be because this is a title unification bout. This is not a mandatory challenge or defense.
But Loma might see the justice in that if he were to lose so it is what it is...or it's simply cuz these mfers had such a rough time coming to an agreement that throwing in a rematch clause was gonna be more problematic than helpful in making the fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostAgree it's a dumb business move, but they are with the same outfit so a rematch seems highly doable if Teo wins. Loma is just fooking himself out of guaranteed money by not getting it included.
But Loma might see the justice in that if he were to lose so it is what it is...or it's simply cuz these mfers had such a rough time coming to an agreement that throwing in a rematch clause was gonna be more problematic than helpful in making the fight.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by _Rexy_ View PostWalters was a far better boxer too.
50/50 fight in my book. Reminds me a bit of Hagler vs Leonard. If no one gets KOd this will one that could be debated for a while.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostI think that's crazy, especially for a unification fight, but I like it because that means the winner can fight Haney or Tank after this, and that's what I want to see!
Comment
Comment