Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Teofimo Lopez: There's No Rematch Clause In Contracts For Lomachenko Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by mxtali View Post
    Based on what?
    Originally posted by Since1976 View Post
    ??? really!! Not saying Loma will loose, but Walters better, interesting point of view. Walter's had his best performance by far when he won his belt, but nothing impressive before or after except the pig punch with a mediocre delivery and not very fast for the weight class.

    50/50 fight in my book. Reminds me a bit of Hagler vs Leonard. If no one gets KOd this will one that could be debated for a while.
    Originally posted by LDBC Slayer View Post
    Is that a joke

    Lopez is a real one, waters was nobody
    You guys are comedy.

    But here's the thing. I'm just a guy on a forum. Don't listen to me. Why don't you listen to Bradley and Ward - multi-time champion boxers - tell you the reason Loma has very little to worry about.

    And this is what I saw especially against Nagatani. Same thing you saw. So don't dispute what they're saying. They're legit flaws of Teofimo and you guys are rating his 'eye test' performances WAY too high while dismissing Nick Walters who was expected to beat the snot out of Loma at the time.




    Shoulder roll until he sees a clear shot, then attack the body viciously, wait for them to open then nail them with a hook.


    Do you REALLY think any of that - ANY of it - will work against Lomachenko?

    Even if he does manage to drop Loma, as we saw with Linares, Loma will just get up and walk you down.

    Experience matters, people. It matters.

    Comment


    • #52
      Btw, at a time Loma-Walters, Walters was considered as top10 p4p and should have brutally KO Loma. Same goes to Rigo btw who should have break his jaw

      Size matter to a degree and it is only kindof advantage Lopez has. Though i have doubts he will be able to use it properly, people tend to underestimate Lomas power and timing.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by mxtali View Post
        A 126 Donaire? This wasn’t 118 Donaire that was blasting dudes. 2nd rd KO over Commey at 135 is a better win IMO.
        I'll take Donaire over any version of Commey.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Stephankotyk View Post
          Btw, at a time Loma-Walters, Walters was considered as top10 p4p and should have brutally KO Loma. Same goes to Rigo btw who should have break his jaw

          Size matter to a degree and it is only kindof advantage Lopez has. Though i have doubts he will be able to use it properly, people tend to underestimate Lomas power and timing.
          lol@walters being top 10 p4p in 2016....he wasnt even on the espns "receiving votes" list for the top 10 in 2016 because loma was his only fight of 2016...his previous was a draw with jason sosa..

          rigo was p4p rated but he was also coming up in weight

          most gave walters and rigo a good shot....and to his credit loma took care of business easily.....theyre good wins...lets not be out here acting like theyre amazing w's....i have nothing against loma but you are blindly trying to rate those wins much higher than they are and act like its an amazing feat

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by revelated View Post
            You guys are comedy.

            But here's the thing. I'm just a guy on a forum. Don't listen to me. Why don't you listen to Bradley and Ward - multi-time champion boxers - tell you the reason Loma has very little to worry about.

            And this is what I saw especially against Nagatani. Same thing you saw. So don't dispute what they're saying. They're legit flaws of Teofimo and you guys are rating his 'eye test' performances WAY too high while dismissing Nick Walters who was expected to beat the snot out of Loma at the time.




            Shoulder roll until he sees a clear shot, then attack the body viciously, wait for them to open then nail them with a hook.


            Do you REALLY think any of that - ANY of it - will work against Lomachenko?

            Even if he does manage to drop Loma, as we saw with Linares, Loma will just get up and walk you down.

            Experience matters, people. It matters.
            LOL nice try! Keep making assumptions about my if you wish. Did i say experience does not matter or that Loma skills were not considerably better? Yeah that's what i thought...

            UK kid knocked Loma down and he's not exactly fast, Teo is faster and if you apply basic physics, can generate more force than the UK kid. That is Teo's opening and like Manny vs Marquez a brutal KO is possible. He has to land that punch, but since the UK kid managed to do it, it makes Teo dangerous. Mikey had more skill and experience than Spence, but size just like experience matters.

            If you know boxing like you claim, you know that a big eraser can be an equalizer in the right hands. Ask RJJ who's permanently damaged because of the less skilled Tarver. Kavaliauskas managed to land one on the better skilled Crawford.

            Take a deep breath before replying, you'll avoid making assumptions about people's comments that do not make any sense.

            Enjoy the fight! It'll be a good one, 50/50 IMO because Loma could school him and make him quit or Teo could land something nasty!

            Comment


            • #56
              still sticking with Teo on this one.

              Comment


              • #57
                NoMasChenko

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Since1976 View Post
                  {my only argument is Linares knockdown}
                  I get it.

                  Teo passes your 'eye test'. You want the best for him. You want him to become a star.

                  You can keep fronting on here. You know the truth.

                  You know how this fight will go. You know it's a mismatch.

                  But keep fronting. It's your right.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    You guys are comedy.
                    But here's the thing. I'm just a guy on a forum. Don't listen to me. Why don't you listen to Bradley and Ward - multi-time champion boxers - tell you the reason Loma has very little to worry about.

                    And this is what I saw especially against Nagatani. Same thing you saw. So don't dispute what they're saying. They're legit flaws of Teofimo and you guys are rating his 'eye test' performances WAY too high while dismissing Nick Walters who was expected to beat the snot out of Loma at the time.
                    Shoulder roll until he sees a clear shot, then attack the body viciously, wait for them to open then nail them with a hook.
                    Do you REALLY think any of that - ANY of it - will work against Lomachenko?
                    Even if he does manage to drop Loma, as we saw with Linares, Loma will just get up and walk you down.
                    Experience matters, people. It matters.

                    My answer to your post:
                    Andre Ward: " I don't think Lomachenko thinks Lopez is special" this is all I need to know about this fight.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                      I think that's crazy, especially for a unification fight, but I like it because that means the winner can fight Haney or Tank after this, and that's what I want to see!
                      Tank isn’t going anywhere near Loma . His reluctance to fight big players has left a bitter taste in my mouth. Haney is game though

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP