Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was Mike Tyson a swarmer or slugger type boxer ?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by BKM- View Post
    Tython may be a thwarmer or thlugger but he baits opponents, making them miss so he can land a bomb.

    His problem is he only fights moving forward. Force him to take a step back and he's completely useless.
    I totally read that in Tyson-speech, was masterful lol

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View Post
      He was a FAST forward moving, EVASIVE, Offensive power puncher.
      ^ This

      He wasn't a counter puncher

      Comment


      • #33
        I see comparison with Porter.

        Porter is far more skilled fighter. Tyson just moved forward, while Porter has better defense, even though he lacks KO power.

        Porter is very skilled welterweight. Mike Tyson was not even very skilled heavyweight.

        It is easier to be KO artist in higher division, because you are heavier and punches are much stronger.
        Last edited by JakeTheBoxer; 08-20-2020, 04:05 PM.

        Comment


        • #34
          He liked to keep distance, unload when he's in close his speedy combinations then get out. That's how I think of him without having seen any of his fights recently

          Comment


          • #35
            Neither...

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
              ^ This

              He wasn't a counter puncher
              Nope. His now extinct OFFENSIVE STYLE allowed him to UNLEASH his Power and speed.

              Comment


              • #37
                Neither when he was focused he was a skilled knock out machine. Even with a broken back he knock someone out

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by GrandpaBernard View Post
                  Mike was a counterpuncher according to himself in the biography he wrote about Cus

                  Peakaboo makes them miss and pay. That counterpunching
                  So because he said it that means it's true regardless of what we can see with our eyes.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    None of them. He wasn't great inside fighter. He was more like front foot, aggressive counter puncher in middle range. Like Tank and Canelo since Kovalev.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post
                      I see comparison with Porter.

                      Porter is far more skilled fighter. Tyson just moved forward, while Porter has better defense, even though he lacks KO power.

                      Porter is very skilled welterweight. Mike Tyson was not even very skilled heavyweight.

                      It is easier to be KO artist in higher division, because you are heavier and punches are much stronger.
                      I have Tyson ahead in skills

                      Porter has awful accuracy

                      the worst accuracy I seen for an elite
                      Last edited by GrandpaBernard; 03-05-2023, 10:29 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP