Prime Erik Morales vs. Vasyl Lomachenko at 130

[NORMNEALON]

I'd pick morales but I wouldn't be surprised if loma pulled a rabbit out the hat . But at 126 . Morales at 130 was one great win really . He was at his best at his first two weights

[Lomadeaux]

Jeez... what a great fantasy matchup.

Roman you’re pretty ****** but this is a great matchup. Remember, I picked Rigo to beat Loma. Erik was one of those fighters who could literally beat anybody.

Also; remember that the Morales that beat Pac was not a prime Morales...

Think about that.

[Boxing Goat]

YDKSAB

K, bye.

Lol! Is that all you have?

Good

Take that L and run along now

[Boxing Goat]

I think so too.

El Terrible was way better than Salido.

Triangle theories do not work and styles make fights

[Boxing Goat]

Prime Morales, pre pre Barrera wars stops Loma!

Triangle theories do not work and styles make fights

[Zaroku]

Triangle theories do not work and styles make fights

Eric was too fast in his prime, and I’m not triangulating anything.

[Boxing Goat]

Eric was too fast in his prime, and I’m not triangulating anything.

He lost to Barrera twice in his prime, who is not even close to Loma's level.

See how that works?

Triangle theories simply do not work in boxing

[Zaroku]

He lost to Barrera twice in his prime, who is not even close to Loma's level.

See how that works?

Triangle theories simply do not work in boxing

I mentioned before he fought Barrera. Pre wars with Barrera

Salido could never beat Loma again.

But, salido got away with low blows, and more.

I have nothing more to add.

Not looking for another long drawn out back and forth, so forgive me if I don’t reply. I’m fighting in the lounge and the dome.

[Boxing Goat]

I mentioned before he fought Barrera. Pre wars with Barrera

Oh, so you think he was no longer prime just because he lost?

Lol how convenient.

Morales was 26 and 28 when he lost to Barrera. And 29 when he lost to Raheem. Those were all prime losses. Both Pacquiao losses were when he was 31, so those are debatable whether he was prime or not but I tend to think a fighters prime is between 24 and 34, personally.

Try a new angle.

Morales was a sharp puncher with a lot of skills. But, as you saw in the Barrera and Raheem fights, those skills were still limited. Prime Loma would make him look like a fool.

[Zaroku]

Oh, so you think he was no longer prime just because he lost?

Lol how convenient.

Morales was 26 and 28 when he lost to Barrera. And 29 when he lost to Raheem. Those were all prime losses. Both Pacquiao losses were when he was 31, so those are debatable whether he was prime or not but I tend to think a fighters prime is between 24 and 34, personally.

Try a new angle.

Morales was a sharp puncher with a lot of skills. But, as you saw in the Barrera and Raheem fights, those skills were still limited. Prime Loma would make him look like a fool.

Nope, not saying that at all. Stop jumping to conclusions.

I am trying to say that his wars with Barrera took a lot out of him.

I think after the first Fight with Pac, in 2000? I think he could have beaten Loma. My opinion.

Just my opinion, and I am entitled to that.