How come Liam Smith was more aggressive with Canelo than GGG?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shadoww702
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2015
    • 41176
    • 4,546
    • 2,938
    • 250,035

    #41
    Originally posted by Mexican Bidness
    I like the Liam the most. Imo he was murkin Munguía with the bidness and wasn’t afraid to trade with Canelo. Gangsta!
    Canelo haters say he suks.I bet on him big against Williams and took the over with Munguia.

    Any dopes think he easy out I take $$$$

    Comment

    • TonyGe
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2016
      • 11867
      • 379
      • 149
      • 173,865

      #42
      Originally posted by icha
      at the end of a round if a fighter lands 2 or 3 punches more than the other judges wont know cuz they dont count every punch (jabs even less)... you ever seen a judge take a note every time a punch lands ?
      this is pro boxing not amateur, you should know the difference by now...
      A jab is a punch if it lands clean it's a scoring blow. After the the first fight I gave Golovkin 1 point for every two jabs that he landed even if it stopped Canelo and/or snapped his head back, and one for every power punch. I did the same for Canelo. Then I looked at who was the aggressor, defense and ring generalship. It confirmed what I saw. Golovkin won the fight.

      Comment

      • Shadoww702
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2015
        • 41176
        • 4,546
        • 2,938
        • 250,035

        #43
        Originally posted by TonyGe
        A jab is a punch if it lands clean it's a scoring blow. After the the first fight I gave Golovkin 1 point for every two jabs that he landed even if it stopped Canelo and/or snapped his head back, and one for every power punch. I did the same for Canelo. Then I looked at who was the aggressor, defense and ring generalship. It confirmed what I saw. Golovkin won the fight.
        Liar! You ignore defense, body work, and combos.

        Did you win money??? *** no! So quit showing me your p@ssy @ss FEELINGS

        Comment

        • icha
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2013
          • 9516
          • 330
          • 370
          • 78,629

          #44
          Originally posted by ruedboy
          Of course judges don't count every punch and a clean punch that staggers an opponent will probably win you the round. But a good judge has to be aware of one fighter outworking another and that means being aware of each fighters work rate or punch output.
          outworking by 2 or 3 punches ?? nah, unless they are using compubox on their phones i really doubt it...
          like i said when the gap is evident then i agree they have to consider that, but on a close round 2 or 3 jabs are not going to give you the round...

          Comment

          • Citizen Koba
            Deplorable Peacenik
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2013
            • 20457
            • 3,951
            • 3,801
            • 2,875,273

            #45
            Originally posted by icha
            outworking by 2 or 3 punches ?? nah, unless they are using compubox on their phones i really doubt it...
            like i said when the gap is evident then i agree they have to consider that, but on a close round 2 or 3 jabs are not going to give you the round...
            They certainly can be the difference... and I can quote you direct from the ABCs Ring Officials Certification program.


            SCORING THE BOUT

            As a professional boxing judge, your analytical skill is to recognize and acknowledge any advantage one participant is having over the other. At any given point of a round, you must know who is winning. At the conclusion of the round, the contestant who has won the round, no matter how minute the margin, is entitled to that round. The difference might have been a single jab, or a defensive move, yet it was still enough to give that boxer the edge.

            Comment

            • TonyGe
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2016
              • 11867
              • 379
              • 149
              • 173,865

              #46
              Originally posted by Shadoww702
              Liar! You ignore defense, body work, and combos.

              Did you win money??? *** no! So quit showing me your p@ssy @ss FEELINGS
              Heres what I said

              "Then I looked at who was the aggressor, defense and ring generalship. "

              No I didn't ignore the other aspects of boxing.

              Honestly I'm starting to think you have a screw loose upstairs. How many times have we had this conversation. How many times do I have to point out that my score and your score which both had Golovkin winning only differed by one round. Are you just in a bad mood today??

              Comment

              • Thuglife Nelo
                Banned
                • Dec 2018
                • 26836
                • 1,299
                • 1,822
                • 654,176

                #47
                Originally posted by icha
                outworking by 2 or 3 punches ?? nah, unless they are using compubox on their phones i really doubt it...
                like i said when the gap is evident then i agree they have to consider that, but on a close round 2 or 3 jabs are not going to give you the round...
                It’s because as I keep saying, the GGG diehards score it 1:1. They think the judges thought GGG and Canelo went in there to play tag.

                Comment

                • TonyGe
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2016
                  • 11867
                  • 379
                  • 149
                  • 173,865

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Mexican Bidness
                  It’s because as I keep saying, the GGG diehards score it 1:1. They think the judges thought GGG and Canelo went in there to play tag.
                  Canelo may as well played tag because he couldn't hurt or buzz Golovkin. His best strategy was Togo to the ropes and wait for a countering opportunity that rarely came. Golovkin must have been laughing inside. How many times is this idiot going to the ropes. Again??? Ok then if that's what you want. I'll just stay in the outside stick to the jab and an occasional right hand and make you look like a dumbass.
                  Last edited by TonyGe; 06-24-2020, 05:44 PM.

                  Comment

                  • icha
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 9516
                    • 330
                    • 370
                    • 78,629

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Citizen Koba
                    They certainly can be the difference... and I can quote you direct from the ABCs Ring Officials Certification program.



                    https://www.abcboxing.com/ring-offic...ation-program/
                    so you honestly think that by the end of the round a judge has the account of every punch landed ??

                    Comment

                    • Thuglife Nelo
                      Banned
                      • Dec 2018
                      • 26836
                      • 1,299
                      • 1,822
                      • 654,176

                      #50
                      Originally posted by icha
                      so you honestly think that by the end of the round a judge has the account of every punch landed ??
                      Exactly. I’m telling you bruh, the ggg diehards expose themselves thinking pro boxing is 1:1 “landed” punches, and they even count grazed... you’re talking about a fanbase that pushed “PAC beat Floyd in slow motion” videos.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP