Dillian Whyte’s case against the WBC is hilarious!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MulaKO
    Zero F@cks Given
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 26896
    • 6,762
    • 6,070
    • 221,421

    #21
    Originally posted by kafkod
    Why would you expect to hear anything about a B sample when UKAD withdrew their charge against him?


    Exactly like I said
    It’s been swept away

    Comment

    • kafkod
      I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2013
      • 24862
      • 2,212
      • 1,826
      • 405,373

      #22
      Originally posted by Inspired
      Canelo was only suspended for 6 months for clenbuterol and wbc didnt strip him. WBC shafted Whyte and he was cleared of any wrongdoing. Like it or not, he was cleared...and yet they moved his mandatory deadline.

      IBF stripped Fury because he had to fight a contracted rematch with Klit. They didn't care, rules are rules. He was rightly stripped.
      IBF stripped Canelo because he wasn't fighting Derv.

      What if Joshua says 'nah, pulev can wait, global pandemic' what do you think bob arum would do? He would sue.

      Whyte has pushed for his mandatory fight if Wilder isn't fit. Bob has responded with 'FRANCHISE BELT'

      What else is whyte supposed to do? seriously.
      The WBC took exactly opposite stances with Canelo and Whyte. They are corrupt to the core. I hope Whyte wins his case and is awarded enough $$$ in damages to force them into bankruptcy.

      Comment

      • kafkod
        I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2013
        • 24862
        • 2,212
        • 1,826
        • 405,373

        #23
        Originally posted by MulaKO
        Exactly like I said
        It’s been swept away
        The B sample can only be used to clear an accused athlete.

        UKAD withdrew their charge = the B sample is irrelevant.

        It really is that simple.

        Comment

        • ShaneMosleySr
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Mar 2019
          • 10325
          • 1,049
          • 903
          • 276,311

          #24
          He has it in writing... but there’s a pandemic.

          Whyte was the one who got out of both those final eliminators.

          The WBC suspended him after he failed a drug test. He was reinstated when he was cleared.

          The WBC never ordered Fury-Whyte for the diamond belt. Whyte called out Fury and Fury said he would only fight him if a title, like the diamond belt, was on the line.

          The wbc sanctioned one wilder-Fury fight. It was a draw so they allowed for a rematch. The wbc champion then lost so he’s allowed to try to regain his title. It’s not a conspiracy, it’s common sense.

          Fury-AJ is a unification fight, which will always trump a mandatory.

          Whyte has been a mandatory for so long because he refused multiple title eliminators and a title shot back in April of 2019. He should sue himself instead.

          Originally posted by EnglishOxide
          He's got it in writing that he will get his shot by February 2021.

          Before that he agreed a final eliminator with Ortiz and Breazeale but both got out of it and got the title shots instead.

          The WBC then suspended him despite passing all VADA tests and proving innocent.

          WBC then ordered Fury v Whyte for the diamond belt, but instead appear to have sanctioned Fury for 3 fights for the WBC title against Wilder instead without having to fight Whyte.

          Now they are talking about a Fury/AJ two fight deal.

          Whyte has been #1 contender for 1000+ days. The WBC deserve to get sued for passing over him.

          Comment

          • ShaneMosleySr
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2019
            • 10325
            • 1,049
            • 903
            • 276,311

            #25
            The WBC didn’t strip Whyte. He’s the interim champion and number one contender.

            The WBC didn’t move Whyte’s mandatory deadline because of a failed test. He only secured a mandatory shot by beating Rivas. Before that he didn’t have a mandatory shot because he never fought a final eliminator.

            Dillian Whyte is a WBC interim champion and mandatory. If he was the IBF mandatory, he would have had his shot because they’re more strict with their rules. Whyte was in line to be the IBF mandatory but refused to fight Pulev so it’s his own fault.

            Bob Arum would make sure Pulev gets his shot. The difference is the IBF ordered the mandatory and the WBC didn’t. So it’s apples and oranges. And again, Whyte gave up his mandatory spot with the IBF so f**k him.

            What else is Whyte supposed to do? Accept one of the three title eliminators he turned down or accept the title fight he turned down in April of 2019?

            Why would anyone feel sorry for the guy? lol.


            Originally posted by Inspired
            Canelo was only suspended for 6 months for clenbuterol and wbc didnt strip him. WBC shafted Whyte and he was cleared of any wrongdoing. Like it or not, he was cleared...and yet they moved his mandatory deadline.

            IBF stripped Fury because he had to fight a contracted rematch with Klit. They didn't care, rules are rules. He was rightly stripped.
            IBF stripped Canelo because he wasn't fighting Derv.

            What if Joshua says 'nah, pulev can wait, global pandemic' what do you think bob arum would do? He would sue.

            Whyte has pushed for his mandatory fight if Wilder isn't fit. Bob has responded with 'FRANCHISE BELT'

            What else is whyte supposed to do? seriously.

            Comment

            • Bum squad
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Mar 2018
              • 175
              • 18
              • 2
              • 9,649

              #26
              Whyte will be 45 and still one eliminator away from a WBC title shot...

              Comment

              • Inspired
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2019
                • 2924
                • 412
                • 85
                • 34,524

                #27
                Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
                The WBC didn’t strip Whyte. He’s the interim champion and number one contender.

                The WBC didn’t move Whyte’s mandatory deadline because of a failed test. He only secured a mandatory shot by beating Rivas. Before that he didn’t have a mandatory shot because he never fought a final eliminator.

                Dillian Whyte is a WBC interim champion and mandatory. If he was the IBF mandatory, he would have had his shot because they’re more strict with their rules. Whyte was in line to be the IBF mandatory but refused to fight Pulev so it’s his own fault.

                Bob Arum would make sure Pulev gets his shot. The difference is the IBF ordered the mandatory and the WBC didn’t. So it’s apples and oranges. And again, Whyte gave up his mandatory spot with the IBF so f**k him.

                What else is Whyte supposed to do? Accept one of the three title eliminators he turned down or accept the title fight he turned down in April of 2019?

                Why would anyone feel sorry for the guy? lol.

                Come on man, ortiz had his chance and lost. the only reason he was in contention and put there as a roadblock for Whyte, was the pbc connection. it's what wilder wanted.
                However Whyte is on record saying he'll fight ortiz as long as he's guaranteed mandatory status..but then wbc couldnt agree to that because of brezeale.
                why was brezeale protected? cuz wilder/pbc yet again. it's very odd bro and you know that full well.

                from a business perspective it makes more sense to push for a fight vs Wilder first. If he beat wilder, he'd be making a lot more vs aj in an undisputed fight. That's the road he decided to go down. It's unfair to say 'oh he should have gone the wbo route' when he knew he'd walk away with alot less.
                plus he's been in with aj already..we've seen that. i wasnt as excited to see that, i wanted to see wilder vs whyte.
                wilder ducked whyte, plain to see. why did wilder fight ortiz again? pure and simple ducking with in house fights.
                why did wilder say 'if whyte wanted it he should have joined the pbc'? something very wrong with that.
                wilder turned down $5m and $8m vs whyte..and yet picked fury for $5m in their first fight.
                it's obv this was done to freeze out matchroom.
                so next you'll be saying 'he should have quit matchroom if he wanted wilder'
                it's bs.

                He was stripped of his mandatory status by the wbc pending the investigation/case.
                after ukad cleared whyte, he got his mandatory status back but with a new deadline. That's blatant double standards.

                Comment

                • Inspired
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Aug 2019
                  • 2924
                  • 412
                  • 85
                  • 34,524

                  #28
                  Originally posted by kafkod
                  The WBC took exactly opposite stances with Canelo and Whyte. They are corrupt to the core. I hope Whyte wins his case and is awarded enough $$$ in damages to force them into bankruptcy.
                  i doubt he's winning the case.
                  he's been done over
                  the only consolation is that he would prob have lost to wilder anyway...and lose his status as a ppv fighter in the uk.

                  Comment

                  • Zelda
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2019
                    • 2081
                    • 398
                    • 73
                    • 19,172

                    #29
                    Where is the case filed? in Mexico?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP