Haye is right to say that about Tyson but he should also include himself in that category ......the difference is Tyson boxed at a higher level with his opponents ...Haye didn’t period
Haye is being a nitpicking bitc6. Tyson in his prime subdued every opponent before or early in his fights. That takes greatness to do that. Later on post King and Givens and jail, Tyson was a shell.
Haye is being a pain in the a55. Just like the tennis fans who nitpick that Roger Federer never saved match points and then came back to win a major. Like Djokovic did several times, and twice against Federer (US Open semis, Wimbledon final).
Tyson was all time great, maybe the all time greatest, at his best. Haye be quiet.
I'm as big a Tyson hater as anyone but he clearly had fights that he had to fight through adversity to win. He just didn't do so against the kind of great competition that others did. That doesn't mean Tyson couldn't do it at all.
Problem is with your take DH is only one has ever overcome the adversity to become the youngest Heavyweight Champion....so you can’t see the forest for the trees but keep talking cause you do that better than fighting!
Comment