Terence Crawford refuses to be B side vs Errol Spence

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DaNeutral.
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2018
    • 10087
    • 1,665
    • 342
    • 144,794

    #41
    Why are the names I see here explaining why Spence is the A side using the EXACT SAME arguments that they wanted to completely ignore when it came to Joshua being the A side over Wilder.

    This is the problem with PBC fan logic. You guna argue then argue but don't do a big 180 turn on it all when it comes to a different fighter. Stick to what you say.

    Comment

    • ShoulderRoll
      Join The Great Resist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 56342
      • 10,189
      • 5,035
      • 763,445

      #42
      Originally posted by DaNeutral.
      Why are the names I see here explaining why Spence is the A side using the EXACT SAME arguments that they wanted to completely ignore when it came to Joshua being the A side over Wilder.

      This is the problem with PBC fan logic. You guna argue then argue but don't do a big 180 turn on it all when it comes to a different fighter. Stick to what you say.
      How is it the same argument?

      Wilder sells better on PPV in America than Joshua does. When it comes to American PPV revenue Wilder is the A-side.

      Think a little more deeply before you post.

      Comment

      • DaNeutral.
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Aug 2018
        • 10087
        • 1,665
        • 342
        • 144,794

        #43
        Originally posted by Ray*
        Anyone that supported Wilder refusing to be B-side shouldn’t say shit about this.
        Exactly. But get ready to be get some lies and double standards chucked in your face.

        Comment

        • DaNeutral.
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2018
          • 10087
          • 1,665
          • 342
          • 144,794

          #44
          Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
          How is it the same argument?

          Wilder sells better on PPV in America than Joshua does. When it comes to American PPV revenue Wilder is the A-side.

          Think a little more deeply before you post.
          LOL when Joshua was making the offers wilder refused and started demanding 50-50 wilder had never even had a PPV.

          Anyway Fury sold those PPV's not Wilder cuz Wilders only other PPV flopped. His track record of PPV's isn't long and isn't very impressive. Joshua has an amazing PPV track record.

          Comment

          • Watermelon
            Amateur
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Feb 2020
            • 13
            • 0
            • 0
            • 1,408

            #45
            How is this drugs cheat Spence not banned ?
            Stunting Gyno like that at sub 10% BF ... Come on who the **** are you guys fooling here ?
            No chance someone Natty or with puberty gyno has that at this level of condition.

            Bruh

            Comment

            • ShoulderRoll
              Join The Great Resist
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 56342
              • 10,189
              • 5,035
              • 763,445

              #46
              Originally posted by DaNeutral.
              LOL when Joshua was making the offers wilder refused and started demanding 50-50 wilder had never even had a PPV.

              Anyway Fury sold those PPV's not Wilder cuz Wilders only other PPV flopped. His track record of PPV's isn't long and isn't very impressive. Joshua has an amazing PPV track record.
              Don't resort to lying now. Fury could only sell 3,577 tickets for the Otto Wallin fight. He wasn't much of a draw on his own.

              The fact is that Wilder's PPV track record in the US craps on Anthony Joshua's.

              So the logic remains consistent.

              Comment

              • Ray*
                Be safe!!!
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 44867
                • 1,654
                • 1,608
                • 558,890

                #47
                Originally posted by DaNeutral.
                Exactly. But get ready to be get some lies and double standards chucked in your face.
                I don’t even need to reply to them, just leaving that out there. Wilder was nothing when he had those offers. Now they are going to push the timeline excuses like he was already selling PPV.

                It’s pretty simple, if you are telling Spence off in this thread then you are a fanboy, that’s if you are one of the posters who backed Wilder turning down offers and claiming he should get 50-50 at that time.

                Comment

                • ShoulderRoll
                  Join The Great Resist
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 56342
                  • 10,189
                  • 5,035
                  • 763,445

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Ray*
                  I don’t even need to reply to them, just leaving that out there. Wilder was nothing when he had those offers. Now they are going to push the timeline excuses like he was already selling PPV.

                  It’s pretty simple, if you are telling Spence off in this thread then you are a fanboy, that’s if you are one of the posters who backed Wilder turning down offers and claiming he should get 50-50 at that time.
                  Wilder was nothing? Another lie.

                  He didn't have PPVs yet but you could compare his American tv ratings with Joshua. Something which was easy to do since they were both with Showtime for a while.

                  Comment

                  • DaNeutral.
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Aug 2018
                    • 10087
                    • 1,665
                    • 342
                    • 144,794

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Ray*
                    I don’t even need to reply to them, just leaving that out there. Wilder was nothing when he had those offers. Now they are going to push the timeline excuses like he was already selling PPV.

                    It’s pretty simple, if you are telling Spence off in this thread then you are a fanboy, that’s if you are one of the posters who backed Wilder turning down offers and claiming he should get 50-50 at that time.
                    LOL its good to see you have clocked what these goons are doing. They do play with the time lines, they put things out of order to try to twist their narratives, but we don't forget the order things have happened in.

                    These fools let enough time pass by and then start lying. Cuz things are no longer fresh in the memory they feel it's a good time to try twist it.

                    Comment

                    • Vasyl’s dad
                      He said no rematch
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 23510
                      • 1,120
                      • 1,945
                      • 50,072

                      #50
                      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
                      No they're not.

                      One has more belts and a significantly better PPV track record.
                      That means nothing. They are both at the same level in terms of stardom. Not household names. They are known in the boxing community but other than that, nobody gives a **** ass about them. This whole a side b side **** is lame anyways. Always was, even when Floyd said it. It’s used as an excuse then, and used as an excuse now.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP