"Terence Crawford says he doesn’t want to be the B-side for a unification fight against IBF/WBC welterweight champion Errol Spence Jr. The rationale that WBO champion Crawford (36-0, 27 KOs) is giving for why he shouldn’t be the B-side is he feels he’s proven more in his career than Spence."
When Crawford talks about having accomplished more with his career, he’s obviously referring to winning world titles in three divisions.
That’s certainly a respectable achievement, which Spence hasn’t matched. But when you look at who Crawford beat to pick up those victories, that’s where the problem starts.
although I think spence deserved a 60/40 , 55/45 type split they should just concede and make it at 50/50 . This fight needs to happen iam sick of hearing about splits from both sides.
although I think spence deserved a 60/40 , 55/45 type split they should just concede and make it at 50/50 . This fight needs to happen iam sick of hearing about splits from both sides.
Would Arum concede to doing 50/50 if his fighter was so clearly in the driver's seat in terms of belts held and PPVs sold?
No.
So I don't see why Spence should concede now that the shoe is on the other foot.
Tweet
Comment