Canelo is criticized for 154-155 yet Floyd could swing 154-147...
Collapse
-
The thread title gets the GGG diehards thinking about boxers fighting at multiple weights. Poster daggum thinks that HBO wouldn’t have paid GGG had he dared at 168 from 2011-2014 because “nobody at 160 wants to fight me doe.”
These same GGG protectors never own up that Gennadiy said “168 is easy for me.” Why would boxing fans follow such fighters when they didn’t move an inch to prove it?Comment
-
I bumped that thread for you before you even brought it up. I’m sorry you feel this owned. I specifically tagged you in that thread that HBO wasn’t Interested in seeing GGG vs Adama whom looked like a midget compared to GGG.Comment
-
i never said that. nice straw man. you said hbo would have paid him the same amount that he got for adama if he had fought someone at 168. the adama fight wasnt an hbo fight so you dont know what you are talking about. the big fights were at 160 at that point. leaving the division doenst make much sense. division hopping just to fight bums doenst make sense when you are champ at 160. if there were a big fight there then sure go for it. but just to fight rocky fielding types? why?The thread title gets the GGG diehards thinking about boxers fighting at multiple weights. Poster daggum thinks that HBO wouldn’t have paid GGG had he dared at 168 from 2011-2014 because “nobody at 160 wants to fight me doe.”
These same GGG protectors never own up that Gennadiy said “168 is easy for me.” Why would boxing fans follow such fighters when they didn’t move an inch to prove it?Comment
-
you bumped a thread that proved you were wrong? well thanks! you said hbo paid for the adama fight and they didnt. hbo wasnt interested you say?
the fight from Monte Carlo could not be resolved. We have tried for the past month to find a way to televise Gennady Golovkin vs. Osumanu Adama on Feb.1 from Monte Carlo. -hbo
you see what i told you about making things up? i mean its a lot easier to do that but yeah doesnt make it trueComment
-
-
-
Why do you keep saying Adama wasn’t an HBO fight when I bumped the HBo-Adama-GGG article bid where I tagged you, proving that HBO wasn’t Interested in paying for that fight? You wan the to bump the thread or link it here to prove that by me bumping it predates any of your posts in this thread? Cute deflection bruh. I said Adama, Rosado, Proksas etc etc. Same purses HBO ei never said that. nice straw man. you said hbo would have paid him the same amount that he got for adama if he had fought someone at 168. the adama fight wasnt an hbo fight so you dont know what you are talking about. the big fights were at 160 at that point. leaving the division doenst make much sense. division hopping just to fight bums doenst make sense when you are champ at 160. if there were a big fight there then sure go for it. but just to fight rocky fielding types? why?
Would’ve paid had GGG fought at 168. You can stay fixated on Adama. Youre proving how GGG diehards are try to justify meaningless less fights that HBI didn’t care for. The production level of that fight was ****** as it was after Rosado and Proksa... You’re still fixated on 160 tsk tsk.Comment
-
Where did I say HBO paid for the Adama fight? I said HBO would’ve paid the same the same purses of Proksa, Adama or Rosados or 2011-2014 had he fought at 168. Your trying too hard to justify that those fights at 160 made sense when there were a pool or 168 fighters to replace those years. Keep acting ******.you bumped a thread that proved you were wrong? well thanks! you said hbo paid for the adama fight and they didnt. hbo wasnt interested you say?
the fight from Monte Carlo could not be resolved. We have tried for the past month to find a way to televise Gennady Golovkin vs. Osumanu Adama on Feb.1 from Monte Carlo. -hbo
you see what i told you about making things up? i mean its a lot easier to do that but yeah doesnt make it trueComment
-
Comment
Comment