Originally posted by mrpain81
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Floyd's resume.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by anonymous2.0 View PostI think most of Floyd's later wins as a megastar were against guys coming off their own big wins. Baldomir was the lineal champ, Hatton was undefeated, Mosely wrecked the undefeated Margarito, Ortiz was in FOY against Berto, Cotto got his revenge off Margarito, Guerrero was on a hot streak, Alvarez had just unified with Trout, and Maidana had just beaten Broner. Oscar and Manny weren't on hot streaks but were megastars in their own right. The only fights where the opponents and fight weren't 'hot' was probably the Judah, Berto, and Marquez.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
Its not a sense of being over protective. It's wondering why people refusing to fight him is held against his resume. It's also wondering why he seems to be the only fighter whose resume is evaluated by who he didn't fight rather than who he did fight.
Floyd fans just want the same criteria used to analyze his resume as we do with every other fighter. I don't think that is too much to ask.
blowblow likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
Nah it’s definitely over protective, whenever a guy makes a Floyd thread the same people always jump straight down their throat, like it’s illegal to question anything regarding Floyd to some people.
I get some anti-Mayweather guys constantly troll and stuff but some guys just wanna discuss his career objectively.
Further, it defies anyone's intelligence to reasonably understand how anyone with an account on this site, and thus considered a die hard fan, would need to discuss this "objectively" for at least the 100th time. The only people who seem to want to "objectively" discuss it are people who use a different standard to analyze resumes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by djtmal View Post
Nobody refused to fight him. That is just an excuse you boys use because holding him accountable for his actions is not in your best interest.
Please just go back to sucking off blowblow. It's the only real talent or skill you have.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
There surely is no question he is a 1st ballot HOF'er and an ATG. For boxers, that is only achieved through the resume .Floyd's resume has made him a 1st ballot HOF'er and THE headliner in a HOF class that will feature Wlad and Ward, plus the guys from last year. As such, there seems to be no need to discuss his resume given these facts.
Further, it defies anyone's intelligence to reasonably understand how anyone with an account on this site, and thus considered a die hard fan, would need to discuss this "objectively" for at least the 100th time. The only people who seem to want to "objectively" discuss it are people who use a different standard to analyze resumes.
We still question Robinson, Leonard, Armstrong, Roy etc. There’s no reason not to question Floyd too as long as it’s objective.blowblow likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
It has been documented that ODH, Shane and Manny refused to fight him. You're never honest about it so I don't expect you to be now.
Please just go back to sucking off blowblow. It's the only real talent or skill you have.
you can suck my dck if you want coz that's your forte.Rec28 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
That’s no reason not to debate it though. It’s a great resume but it could have been even better.
We still question Robinson, Leonard, Armstrong, Roy etc. There’s no reason not to question Floyd too as long as it’s objective.Rec28 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
There surely is no question he is a 1st ballot HOF'er and an ATG. For boxers, that is only achieved through the resume .Floyd's resume has made him a 1st ballot HOF'er and THE headliner in a HOF class that will feature Wlad and Ward, plus the guys from last year. As such, there seems to be no need to discuss his resume given these facts.
Further, it defies anyone's intelligence to reasonably understand how anyone with an account on this site, and thus considered a die hard fan, would need to discuss this "objectively" for at least the 100th time. The only people who seem to want to "objectively" discuss it are people who use a different standard to analyze resumes.
Rec28 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment