Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Banks Explains Why Klitschko Let Joshua Off The Hook After Sixth
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Boxviewer View PostAJ ducking Wilder? You have just won the comedian of century award. Cong****!
You won't get more obvious proof than that
Comment
-
Sometimes the fighter has to abandon most of the 'safety first' mantra and just go all out to stop their foe. Banks was right, Vitali was wrong. But having said that, Wlad's performance was very impressive that night... even in defeat.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jkp View PostAJ beat an old man. The shell of Wlad. Rematch didn't happen as it was clear Wladimir was well past his his used by date at 40+ years old. And would be even older in the event of rematch. His withered old skinny legs in his boxing trunks was a sad sight. Should have retired sooner.
Tyson Fury did not beat up or deter Kiltschko at any point in their fight 'Joshua's performance in comparison was more emphatic and conclusive'.
Wladimir Kiltschko vs Anthony Joshua is the greatest heavyweight title fight of the past 20 years.
Comment
-
Let's say he tried to go for the KO and got caught in the process? What if Wlad would fail to take AJ out and be extremely exhausted in the following round and stopped? After each fight we can talk about what IF but it's pointless. The past is in the past.
Comment
-
Originally posted by VatoMulatto View PostLet's say he tried to go for the KO and got caught in the process? What if Wlad would fail to take AJ out and be extremely exhausted in the following round and stopped?
At least try to go for the win. That was typical of Klitschko's career, though. He never liked to take a risk.
Comment
-
Ultimately Wlad should have known and gone for the KO.
I feel he was much less cautious against Joshua but he couldn't leave that cautious nature totally behind him - especially when it looked like he was winning, and he had something to lose.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostThen he would have lost the fight. But he lost the fight anyway, didn't he?
At least try to go for the win. That was typical of Klitschko's career, though. He never liked to take a risk.
We know Wlad didn't win that's why it's so easy to say he should've done it differently. However "IF" Wlad tried to go for the KO and was caught with a counter and lost. This article would've been about Wlad was wrong for pushing too hard for the KO. Vitali was right. Wlad should've done what he had been doing for the last decade when he was undefeated for 11 years. Take his time and break down AJ who had not much left anyway. Now he went out of character, tried to finish AJ and paid the price.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View PostAt the time I wanted Joshua to beat Klitchko because I was over the Klitchko era. I found klitchkos reign as champion to be boring. Now in hindsight, I wish he'd had beaten Joshua as Joshua's time as champion so far has been even more uneventful.
Wilder killed off the heavyweight scene, would have been the same whoever won.
Comment
Comment