Who had the worst first Defeat Naseem or Broner?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
-
Talking of history rewriting lol
Yes Barrera was a heavy underdog, but that was simply because most experts didnt believe any 122-126lber could stand up to Hameds power in the end. There were still question marks over his chin after Jones too.
Regardless Barrera had already accomplished A LOT. 2 x super bantam champ, win over McKinney, and most people thought he beat Morales who was consensus p4p top 10.Comment
-
-
Had an epic war against Morales and you call that ‘eye test’? LMAO
If there was an ‘eye test’ between 2, it was Naz. Not saying the names of his resume is not good but his pre-dominance in the FW division plus his ‘eye test’ abilities is what made him the favorite against Barrera. But Barrera is the more proven one against quality.
Naz never had an EM in his resumeComment
-
Comment
-
Wait a sec. you bring up a big point. Naseem really doesn’t have any major names on his resume like broner prior to their first lost.Had an epic war against Morales and you call that ‘eye test’? LMAO
If there was an ‘eye test’ between 2, it was Naz. Not saying the names of his resume is not good but his pre-dominance in the FW division plus his ‘eye test’ abilities is what made him the favorite against Barrera. But Barrera is the more proven one against quality.
Naz never had an EM in his resumeComment
Comment