Who had the worst first Defeat Naseem or Broner?

[Removed Now]

Who’s first lost was more demeaning ?

Both was pretty flamboyant fighters that love to put on a show . Who’s lost was worst ?

[BodyBagz]

Naseem got clowned by a HOFer
Broner, not so much.

[sunny31]

Naseem got clowned by a HOFer
Broner, not so much.

Exactly...

He also had a far better career

[Ray*]

Ego-wise? Got to be Naz. But to be honest you can make a case that it was actually Broner. Naz took his loss like a man after the fight, he wasn't totally dominated like it was made out, Broner was dominated, suffered a couple of KD, got dry humped, left the arena looking like a broken man physically.

[Earl-Hickey]

Hamed lost to arguably an ATG Broner lost to just a good fighter

[Combat Talk Radio]

Gotta love the history rewriting.

Barrera was 'eye test' back then. Hadn't hardly done anything and was not expected to beat Hamed.

[bulldognyc]

Who’s first lost was more demeaning ?

Both was pretty flamboyant fighters that love to put on a show . Who’s lost was worst ?

Broner by a mile. Packed house in enemy territory, San Antonio, dropped twice and humiliated at his physical peak. Dude hasn’t been the same since.

[Quicksilver*]

Barrera was a legend and broner got worked by a good fighter.

[Removed Now]

Naseem got clowned by a HOFer
Broner, not so much.

True^^^^^^

[Removed Now]

Ego-wise? Got to be Naz. But to be honest you can make a case that it was actually Broner. Naz took his loss like a man after the fight, he wasn't totally dominated like it was made out, Broner was dominated, suffered a couple of KD, got dry humped, left the arena looking like a broken man physically.

True I can support this.