Again, WADA revised the Clen rule to GIVE a threshold for meat contamination cases. The molecular testing has to be consistent with meat contamination. In fact the problem is that you still don’t understand that WADA knows the decay of Clen (pill) decay metabolize vs Meat contamination. In fact you continue to not acknowledge SMRTL’s Director to say it was meat contamination, the range. What was the threshold for WADA’s revision in 2019, 2000 picos right? What was Vargas’ sample? 1200 picos. Canelo’s? 600 picos. Thing is you just conclude a number and assume that’s how WADA research concludes.. that’s a very immature way to view it..
VADA knew all that. The WBC and Mexican boxing have known about these instances. Most Mexican boxers aren’t/weren’t enrolled in VADA testing, just general testing done in Mexico who knows what those standards are.
VADA knew all that. The WBC and Mexican boxing have known about these instances. Most Mexican boxers aren’t/weren’t enrolled in VADA testing, just general testing done in Mexico who knows what those standards are.
I know you're just making **** up and you know you're just making **** up. Simple fact is WADA still acknowledge they have no discriminatory test, and if they did they wouldn't have needed to raise the threshold would they? Because they would know for sure one way or another whether a dude had eaten contaminated meat or not. Think about it. The increased threshold is simply a pragmatic acknowledgement of the need to shift the burden of proof due to impossibility of proving guilt, what it absolutely isn't is a proof of innocence of intent. Oh and whilst we're about it you probably want to recheck the meaning of the phrase 'consistent with'.
Comment