THROWBACK: Scoring Castillo/Mayweather 1

[Legends456]

One of the most controversial boxing matches in history. Floyd was not on my radar at this time of his career, I was all about the heavyweights especially Lennox Lewis.

In watching the fight back - and I've seen it at least three times over the years - there was no situation where I saw a robbery. I saw a very close contested fight - and what really made it "controversial" might be people ignoring the point deductions.

I counted 4 swing rounds. That's a lot. Two I gave to Floyd, two I gave to Jose.

Either way, this was a pick-em and definitely warranted the rematch which was still close, but clearer for Floyd.

I think that it was awful close. If Floyd really was injured in the fight (which I believe he was) that could be why he seemed to struggle so much more than their second fight. I like Castillo and honestly thought he pulled it out, but, Floyd fought great as always and no, I don’t think it quite qualifies as a robbery.

[Boxing_1013]

no... none of that happened

just like all the other silly stuff you make up

btw, you can easily check post-history

1) I said Fury would beat Wilder MANY times leading up to the fight... in MANY threads

2) I also said that Fury was the best heavyweight MANY times... in MANY threads... for MONTHS/YEARS

I make PLENTY of predictions kid







remember this prediction... ???

Yet I've never seen you post a scorecard from a fight.

And right on cue...another 'vague' prediction lol...GGG could have KOed Canelo in 7 rounds...and you would have said 'I told y'all Canelo was gonna light him up...he just got caught while he was doing so'.

Post some scorecards in fights you talk about my friend if you want me to take you seriously at all...then we can all discuss what we saw in the fight and why we scored it the way we did.

When you never post cards, and take credit for vague predictions, your credibility goes out the window my friend.

Btw you literally said that guy was right on scoring the fight the way he did...when he was clearly wrong...again you let your personal biases judge how you judge fights and fighters, and how you handle interactions on this site.

God Bless.

[Boxing_1013]

One of the most controversial boxing matches in history. Floyd was not on my radar at this time of his career, I was all about the heavyweights especially Lennox Lewis.

In watching the fight back - and I've seen it at least three times over the years - there was no situation where I saw a robbery. I saw a very close contested fight - and what really made it "controversial" might be people ignoring the point deductions.

I counted 4 swing rounds. That's a lot. Two I gave to Floyd, two I gave to Jose.

Either way, this was a pick-em and definitely warranted the rematch which was still close, but clearer for Floyd.

What's throwing you off is, who won the round?

In Castillo/Mayweather, Castillo didn't win the rounds. By the book.

Even if you subjectively thought Castillo won the round where Floyd got a point taken off, explain why it's not 9-9?

Lol...read your comments regarding round 8 again...you said

"Ref takes a point from Castillo for hitting off the break. Castillo was winning the round IMO; could be a 9-9 except 10 point must"

You said you gave Floyd the round because Castillo had a point taken away; you tried to say that Floyd had to win the round because of that deduction..that is not true and you clearly don't understand what the 10 point must system means.

I showed you the Fury-Wilder 2 card to illustrate how pro judges handle that situation..you score the round how you would have otherwise scored it, and then deduct the point afterwards...there is even a special separate column for it on the real judges' cards.

You're trying to muddy the waters here so you don't come off as an idiot...I don't really care man...I already have seen your character here and you have no decency to simply admit you have misunderstood a rule in boxing/how fights are scored.

It is OK...most of us on here are not experts in every facet of the sport, and we should all appreciate learning from each other.

Just have some honor and admit you were wrong...and if you can't do that then just move on.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Lol...read your comments regarding round 8 again...you said

"Ref takes a point from Castillo for hitting off the break. Castillo was winning the round IMO; could be a 9-9 except 10 point must"

You can't be blind, because you're posting on here.

I went ahead and underlined it for you.

You said you gave Floyd the round because Castillo had a point taken away; you tried to say that Floyd had to win the round because of that deduction..that is not true and you clearly don't understand what the 10 point must system means.

No, I said that in my eyes Castillo would have won the round IF he didn't get a point taken off.

Since Floyd didn't get a point taken, he wins the round.

Why are you not getting this?

I showed you the Fury-Wilder 2 card to illustrate how pro judges handle that situation..you score the round how you would have otherwise scored it, and then deduct the point afterwards...there is even a special separate column for it on the real judges' cards.

Here's the problem.

In the case of Wilder/Fury 2, you ended up with a 10/9 scorecard before the point deduction and 9/9, according to those judges.

Yet, in Castillo/Mayweather, you ended up (by your OWN admission) with a 10/8 round against Floyd in Round 10 AFTER the point deduction.

Why?



Do you understand why you're sounding silly? You're debating the wrong round.

I'll say it again. BE CONSISTENT.

If you subjectively thought Round 8 was a 9/9, that means Round 10 is also a 9/9 for the same damn reason.

So let's change it and see what we get WHEN WE'RE CONSISTENT.

Oh, that's right - the same damn score. 114-112 for Floyd.

So I'll make this easy for you.

• A: I'm right, it's a 10 point must, both point deduct rounds are 10-8 for each guy, you get with 114-112 for Floyd. OR
• B; I'm wrong, you somehow come to 9-9 after a point deduction, both rounds ended up 9-9, you still get 114-112 for Floyd.

Pick one, so I can expose your hypocrisy.

[aboutfkntime]

Yet I've never seen you post a scorecard from a fight.

And right on cue...another 'vague' prediction lol...GGG could have KOed Canelo in 7 rounds...and you would have said 'I told y'all Canelo was gonna light him up...he just got caught while he was doing so'.

Post some scorecards in fights you talk about my friend if you want me to take you seriously at all...then we can all discuss what we saw in the fight and why we scored it the way we did.

When you never post cards, and take credit for vague predictions, your credibility goes out the window my friend.

Btw you literally said that guy was right on scoring the fight the way he did...when he was clearly wrong...again you let your personal biases judge how you judge fights and fighters, and how you handle interactions on this site.

God Bless.

I do not discuss boxing with a little tosser who DKSAB

your fight breakdowns are the ret4rded opinion of a silly casual fan who see's whatever he wants to see... you shot your credibility in the foot months ago

tell us that story again... about how Golovkin has faced more quality opponents that nearly every other fighter in history

both of those breakdowns were **** on... I was one of the few who said that Canelo will be too sharp for Golovkin... and I told everyone that Fury would be too much for Wilder... just like I am telling you that Fury will be too much for Joshua

[Boxing_1013]

You can't be blind, because you're posting on here.

I went ahead and underlined it for you.



No, I said that in my eyes Castillo would have won the round IF he didn't get a point taken off.

Since Floyd didn't get a point taken, he wins the round.

Why are you not getting this?



Here's the problem.

In the case of Wilder/Fury 2, you ended up with a 10/9 scorecard before the point deduction and 9/9, according to those judges.

Yet, in Castillo/Mayweather, you ended up (by your OWN admission) with a 10/8 round against Floyd in Round 10 AFTER the point deduction.

Why?



Do you understand why you're sounding silly? You're debating the wrong round.

I'll say it again. BE CONSISTENT.

If you subjectively thought Round 8 was a 9/9, that means Round 10 is also a 9/9 for the same damn reason.

So let's change it and see what we get WHEN WE'RE CONSISTENT.

Oh, that's right - the same damn score. 114-112 for Floyd.

So I'll make this easy for you.

• A: I'm right, it's a 10 point must, both point deduct rounds are 10-8 for each guy, you get with 114-112 for Floyd. OR
• B; I'm wrong, you somehow come to 9-9 after a point deduction, both rounds ended up 9-9, you still get 114-112 for Floyd.

Pick one, so I can expose your hypocrisy.

Bro no offense...but you're either a complete idiot, or you have no honor...or maybe both.

[aboutfkntime]

You can't be blind, because you're posting on here.

I went ahead and underlined it for you.



No, I said that in my eyes Castillo would have won the round IF he didn't get a point taken off.

Since Floyd didn't get a point taken, he wins the round.

Why are you not getting this?



Here's the problem.

In the case of Wilder/Fury 2, you ended up with a 10/9 scorecard before the point deduction and 9/9, according to those judges.

Yet, in Castillo/Mayweather, you ended up (by your OWN admission) with a 10/8 round against Floyd in Round 10 AFTER the point deduction.

Why?



Do you understand why you're sounding silly? You're debating the wrong round.

I'll say it again. BE CONSISTENT.

If you subjectively thought Round 8 was a 9/9, that means Round 10 is also a 9/9 for the same damn reason.

So let's change it and see what we get WHEN WE'RE CONSISTENT.

Oh, that's right - the same damn score. 114-112 for Floyd.

So I'll make this easy for you.

• A: I'm right, it's a 10 point must, both point deduct rounds are 10-8 for each guy, you get with 114-112 for Floyd. OR
• B; I'm wrong, you somehow come to 9-9 after a point deduction, both rounds ended up 9-9, you still get 114-112 for Floyd.

Pick one, so I can expose your hypocrisy.

owned LMAO

he is just a little tosser who has never stepped foot in a gym in his short miserable life

[aboutfkntime]

Bro no offense...but you're either a complete idiot, or you have no honor...or maybe both.

you just got OWNED... AGAIN !!

that was a weak reply dude, answer his question

[Boxing_1013]

I do not discuss boxing with a little tosser who DKSAB

your fight breakdowns are the ret4rded opinion of a silly casual fan who see's whatever he wants to see... you shot your credibility in the foot months ago

tell us that story again... about how Golovkin has faced more quality opponents that nearly every other fighter in history

both of those breakdowns were **** on... I was one of the few who said that Canelo will beat Golovkin... and I told everyone that Fury would be too much for Wilder

Lol...you are incapable of having a good-natured debate with someone who merely has a different opinion than you...you take everything super emotionally and try and get nasty with anyone on here who disagrees with you...and to your 2nd paragraph, you are projecting hard.

I wasn't talking about discussing anything with me lol...I was saying that you never have posted a scorecard from a fight on the forum from what I can tell...even when asked, and when going into detail about certain fights, you have never posted a card.

You certainly come off to me as someone who writes the headline before the story even happens...if you want to be taken more seriously on here (by everyone) I suggest just sticking to the ins and outs of boxing, and maybe posting some scorecards from time to time, to back up some of your talk.

In lieu of that, with your pretty clear bias for and against some fighters, you are very hard to take seriously my friend.

In any event, God Bless and I hope you have a great week!

[Boxing_1013]

you just got OWNED... AGAIN !!

that was a weak reply dude, answer his question

I already tried to help him, and pointed out where he had an incorrect understanding of the rules...I don't need to say it 100 times.

As mentioned prior...you continue to prove yourself to be who everyone who has dealt with you knows you to be...you pick sides not based on what actually happens/who won/who is right...but rather on who you like and want to win.

If you don't understand what he tried to say initially, and why he was wrong, I can't help ya man.

I thought you wouldn't be THAT ****** to clearly back someone who is clearly 100% wrong...but go ahead man, it's the internet and you can't hurt your rep on here any more than it is currently lol.