Announcement

**Boxing_1013** · 03-01-2020, 10:39 PM

Originally posted by revelated View Post

I really don't know what's difficult here.

Wilder/Fury 1 (that's ONE)

Here's CBS's scorecard:

Fury was dropped in Round 9. He otherwise won that round. You don't see them calling it 10-9 because the rules dictate that it's a 10-8 round. Same with Round 12.

Us fans can say we "think" it should be whatever - but it doesn't matter.

Wilder/Fury 2

Here's CBS's scorecard:

Now, show me where they scored 9 points on Fury for Round 5 after Bayless took a point. They should have, they didn't. That round should be automatic 10-8 for Wilder UNLESS he got dropped, which he didn't. Instead they left Fury with 10 points which doesn't make sense, but they did that because Fury was so dominant.

Broner/Maidana

Chino drops Broner - puts it 10-8 Chino. Chino headbutts Broner, gets a point taken off. Both guys lose a point = 9-9 is the fair score. but ONLY because both guys lost a point.

Castillo/Mayweather

Round 8, Castillo lost a point, period. That's a 10-8 for Floyd - nullifies everything else. Just like Wilder/Fury 1.

Round 10 - Floyd lost a point, period. That's a 10-8 for Jose - nullifies everything else. Just like Wilder/Fury 1.

If both guys dropped a point or one guy got dropped and one dropped a point, then you can make a case for 9-9.

If only one fighter drops a point, it's a 10 point must.

The reason the other cards don't make any sense is that people say it's definitely 9-9 on Round 8 but 10-8 for Jose on Round 10. Why does that make sense? It doesn't. it's just bias.

Btw dude...you continue to dig yourself a hole and show how ****** you are lol.

When there is a KD it is not an automatic 10-8 round...very rarely, if the fighter who was KD comes back to dominate the round, you could score it a 10-9 round.

Once again you show you have no idea what the rules of boxing actually are.

I showed you the OFFICIAL cards from the judges in Fury-Wilder 2...the card breaks down very clearly how the real judges decide situations like that.

On the bold part about the CBS scorecard fight...you are a fuc.king ****** dude lol.

On Broner-Maidana - if Maidana drops him, and loses a point for headbutting, it is a 9-8 round not a 9-9 round you dumba.ss.

I didn't even see this comment earlier, and how ****** of an argument you were making.

Look at the cards in the Fury-Wilder 2 fight...look how the judges scored the 5th round when Fury got the KD and then had a point deducted.

You are a complete dumba.ss and my new least favorite poster on here...cong****, you are a very very little man.

**Boxing_1013** · 03-01-2020, 10:56 PM

"How It Works:

Boxing in the U.S. is scored by three ringside judges using (almost exclusively) the 10 point must system. This means that the winner of the round will always be rewarded with 10 points, unless there is a deduction from a foul. In a standard round the loser of the round would receive 9 points. However, when a knockdown occurs it will result in a 10-8 round 99% of the time. Likewise, two knockdowns would result in a 10-7 round...and so on. There is no definitive rule however that you MUST score a or three knockdown 10-7 or 10-6. A great example of this was the great fight on May 8, 2004 between Manny Pacquaio and Juan Manuel Marquez. Marquez was knocked down three times in the first round which in most people's minds meant the round should have been scored 10-6 (I personally had scored the round 10-7 as aside from the knockdowns Marquez had a good round). The final scores after 12 rounds ended up 115-110 Paquiao, 115-110 Marquez and 113-113 draw. This meant the fight was a draw. The judge who scored the bout 113-113 gave the first round to Manny 10-7 rather than 10-6, in effect that one point difference was the reason the fight was scored a draw."

https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2007/10/7/143729/816

Here try educating yourself a bit.

**Boxing_1013** · 03-01-2020, 10:58 PM

"The 10-point must system of scoring: Fans may accept as a given the fact that the 10-point must system is universal, but that wasn’t the case until recently. Putting aside the possibility of a point deduction by the referee for repeated low blows or other infractions, the winner of a round must receive 10 points, and the loser nine or less. A typical round is 10-9.

If a boxer scores a knockdown, that's usually a 10-8 round. - Note - not ALWAYS - If a boxer thoroughly dominates a round, even without a knockdown, it also could be scored 10-8. If a boxer scores two knockdowns in a round, it’s generally scored 10-7, and so on."

**Boxing_1013** · 03-01-2020, 11:10 PM

Originally posted by revelated View Post

Fury was dropped in Round 9. He otherwise won that round. You don't see them calling it 10-9 because the rules dictate that it's a 10-8 round. Same with Round 12.

Us fans can say we "think" it should be whatever - but it doesn't matter.

Broner/Maidana

Chino drops Broner - puts it 10-8 Chino. Chino headbutts Broner, gets a point taken off. Both guys lose a point = 9-9 is the fair score. but ONLY because both guys lost a point.

Castillo/Mayweather

Round 8, Castillo lost a point, period. That's a 10-8 for Floyd - nullifies everything else. Just like Wilder/Fury 1.

Round 10 - Floyd lost a point, period. That's a 10-8 for Jose - nullifies everything else. Just like Wilder/Fury 1.

If both guys dropped a point or one guy got dropped and one dropped a point, then you can make a case for 9-9.

If only one fighter drops a point, it's a 10 point must.

The reason the other cards don't make any sense is that people say it's definitely 9-9 on Round 8 but 10-8 for Jose on Round 10. Why does that make sense? It doesn't. it's just bias.

It depends on who won the round outside of the deduction man...if someone felt JLC won both rounds outside of that it would be a 9-9 and 10-8 round...if they felt Floyd won both, it would be a 10-8 and 9-9 round etc.

You gave Floyd the 8th round because you said you had to in order to have one of them get to 10 points in that round...you are incorrect...just admit it learn from it and move on.

Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post

Time, while I have you here, just want to get you on the record that you agree with Rev on:

1) that a round with a KD is ALWAYS scored 10-8?

2) that, as he said in the 8th round of Floyd-JLC, that he had to give Floyd the 8th round, because JLC had a point deducted, so in order to satisfy the 10 point must system, he had to give Floyd the 10 in that round, and JLC an 8?

3) that you agree that Maidana dropping Broner, and then getting a point off for headbutting, that the round should be scored 9-9?

Since you keep it so real and just deal with the facts, just want to get you on record here buddy.

Of course...we all know that:

1) in rare cases, a guy can get KD and still win the rest of the round by enough points to only lose the round 10-9 instead of 10-8...it is not an automatic rule that you have to score a KD 10-8.

2) that you score a round for the winner...and then deduct the points taken off after that...you don't automatically give the guy who didn't get a point taken off 10 points in the round.

3) obviously the score in that round would be 10-8, with a 1 pt deduction from Maidana, for a 9-8 round.

**aboutfkntime** · 03-02-2020, 04:50 PM

Originally posted by Boxing_1013 View Post

Lol...you are incapable of having a good-natured debate with someone who merely has a different opinion than you...you take everything super emotionally and try and get nasty with anyone on here who disagrees with you...and to your 2nd paragraph, you are projecting hard.

I wasn't talking about discussing anything with me lol...I was saying that you never have posted a scorecard from a fight on the forum from what I can tell...even when asked, and when going into detail about certain fights, you have never posted a card.

You certainly come off to me as someone who writes the headline before the story even happens...if you want to be taken more seriously on here (by everyone) I suggest just sticking to the ins and outs of boxing, and maybe posting some scorecards from time to time, to back up some of your talk.

In lieu of that, with your pretty clear bias for and against some fighters, you are very hard to take seriously my friend.

In any event, God Bless and I hope you have a great week!

no kid, that is all garbage

just like all the other garbage you post

FACT: I have no intention of entertaining a little tosser who DKSAB

you already PROVED on multiple occasions... that you are just another casual-fan idiot

thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo.....