Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Parker's Manager To Wilder: Take Step-Aside, Allow Fury-Joshua

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Claude Palle View Post
    Wrong and strong,lol. You admit to being stubborn. No offense but if this guy is who you say he is, then you are nuts for entertaining him. I know the type. You will be holding your hand on your arse waiting for an apology if the third fight comes off. Folks like that spend more time attacking and less time defending. Why? Because their statements are generally proven inaccurate.He is correct in that there can be large pre-fight guarantees. High expectations, high guarantees. Low expectations, low guarantees, if any at all. It's not rocket science. From what I gather from friends in the industry, rematch clauses are already approved by the networks. Otherwise what would be the point? The networks are stuck with this fight if Wilder wants it. That's why FS1 is replaying a version of Wilder/Ortiz 2 to try and hype the Fury/Wilder third fight. Apparently Wilder will exercise his right to the fight.
    Perhaps you can explain to the guy that saying something "might" happen is not the same as "will", i think this is what he's really struggling with.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
      Wilder prevented the biggest fight at HW for years and now he's preventing the next. He's done nothing but hold the division back. GTFO of the sport already you bum.
      I TRIED BRO.
      You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Robbie Barrett again.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
        Perhaps you can explain to the guy that saying something "might" happen is not the same as "will", i think this is what he's really struggling with.
        I am certainly not defending either one of you for a long winded post. I did get a laugh out of it though. I was wondering if it was two trolls. With that being said "might" implies that they have an option. From what I understand the networks were already on board when the contracts were signed. Which means they "cant" do anything about it. Cappe could have stated that and moved on. He admitted to being stubborn and it showed. As for your responses........."Wrong and strong" might apply. I am only being blunt and honest. My aim when I joined this forum was to discuss professional boxing, not worrying about being right or wrong.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
          Still struggling with "might" are you? Saying something might happen is not a prediction. I hope English isn't your first language.

          You actually made claims like purses aren't in rematch clauses, 25 million can't be guaranteed and filed purses are guarantees. All of which i did prove wrong. DERP DERP
          I guess the difference is that I admit when my info is not 100% percent accurate. You are still tring to weasel out of the original point of me responding to your post. Now you are using semantics.
          Since I have joined boxingScene, it's always the same with guys like you. Completely incorrect but instead of owning up to it you try and find discrepancies with other posters replies. If the fight is signed then you were wrong. If the networks cancel it then I am wrong. Plain and simple. Oh sorry, you said they "might", as if they had any say in the matter. No point in trying to give you any more advice. As for good advice, the wise don't need it and the fools don't take it! I admitted to my stubbornness. I have acknowleged a fault now I must work on fixing it. I wasted enough time on this thread already. You were incorrect, move on!

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Brettcappe View Post
            I guess the difference is that I admit when my info is not 100% percent accurate. You are still tring to weasel out of the original point of me responding to your post. Now you are using semantics.
            Since I have joined boxingScene, it's always the same with guys like you. Completely incorrect but instead of owning up to it you try and find discrepancies with other posters replies. If the fight is signed then you were wrong. If the networks cancel it then I am wrong. Plain and simple. Oh sorry, you said they "might", as if they had any say in the matter. No point in trying to give you any more advice. As for good advice, the wise don't need it and the fools don't take it! I admitted to my stubbornness. I have acknowleged a fault now I must work on fixing it. I wasted enough time on this thread already. You were incorrect, move on!
            I can be neither wrong nor right. The only one that made claims was you. You were proven wrong.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
              I can be neither wrong nor right. The only one that made claims was you. You were proven wrong.
              Wow. A thick head and always the last word. The networks "might" cancel the fight implies that they "can". We can go on and on with this. Am I wrong at times? Absolutely! The difference with guys like you and I? I am man enough to admit it. You didn't realize that the networks were already signed on. Shyte happens. None of us know all the intricacies of the sport. We learn as we go. At least some of us. "It's what you learn after you know it all that matters". Have a good day Robbie. It's my fault for continuing on when I should have realized that you either don't get or refuse to admit it. You would get a lot more respect on this forum by showing humility. Some of us have been around the game for decades.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Brettcappe View Post
                Wow. A thick head and always the last word. The networks "might" cancel the fight implies that they "can". We can go on and on with this. Am I wrong at times? Absolutely! The difference with guys like you and I? I am man enough to admit it. You didn't realize that the networks were already signed on. Shyte happens. None of us know all the intricacies of the sport. We learn as we go. At least some of us. "It's what you learn after you know it all that matters". Have a good day Robbie. It's my fault for continuing on when I should have realized that you either don't get or refuse to admit it. You would get a lot more respect on this forum by showing humility. Some of us have been around the game for decades.
                Nothing to admit. There might be a clause in the contract that says Wilder has to nut on your face. Keyword "might"......... Now i'm not claiming there is but there could be. Unless you see the contract then how can you say i'm wrong?

                The only one that'ss been proven wrong is you.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                  Nothing to admit. There might be a clause in the contract that says Wilder has to nut on your face. Keyword "might"......... Now i'm not claiming there is but there could be. Unless you see the contract then how can you say i'm wrong?
                  Thick head and the last word. Probably a nurture issue. You can always blame your parents! I'll leave this post by saying "you are right Robbie, the networks "might" cancel the fight". Does that make you feel better.

                  Humility is the most difficult of all virtues to achieve; nothing dies harder than the desire to think well of self.

                  T.S. Eliot

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Brettcappe View Post
                    Thick head and the last word. Probably a nurture issue. You can always blame your parents! I'll leave this post by saying "you are right Robbie, the networks "might" cancel the fight". Does that make you feel better.

                    Humility is the most difficult of all virtues to achieve; nothing dies harder than the desire to think well of self.

                    T.S. Eliot
                    I know i'm right. I have been all along finally you've realised it and you now know what "might" means, pat yourself on the back.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                      I know i'm right. I have been all along finally you've realised it and you now know what "might" means, pat yourself on the back.

                      Of course I was being sarcastic,lol. "More people would learn from their mistakes if they weren't so busy denying them". You know you are right?,lol. You couldn't have been more wrong. Yet you don't see it. That sentence above has always intrigued me in life. Someone who is clearly incorrect yet sticks to their guns at all costs. I'll have to talk to a psychologist friend of mine and ask him for some guidance. What exactly causes that flaw in people? The obvious answer is some sort of insecurity. I'll get back to you with his answer. Have a great day robbie!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP