at this point i'd say mayweather. he was the better fighter after all. but pacquiao is still going and he can honestly make it a talk worth having if he beats spence. you can argue that a W over spence would be better than anything floyd's got on his resume.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who will be talked about more in 100 years? Floyd Mayweather Jr or Manny Pacquiao?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
Don't laugh at pac not being able to do something Floyd couldn't do also! Floyd couldn't beat horn.in Australia or morales and Bradley let alone maidana in Argentina or nel o in mexico. So don't laugh about it!
That's just rude
you should be ashamed of yourself.
Comment
-
-
Theaganese and Euthymos are the oldest I know of but there are plenty of boxers history never separates. Regardless of time. It's been over 2k years since Theo licked Euth, but, try to find me a single scrap of media from any period that covers one without mentioning the other.
I seriously doubt Money and Manny will have any difference in the future. Neither will be spoken about more because the subject of one prompts the other.
There's loads of fighters you can't look up without learning about their rival. It's JMM who will be the well actually figure of the future.
Comment
-
That's an easy one. They are both great but if I had to choose between the two then it would have to be Manny Pacquiao. It's because he was more of an offensive oriented fighter with a crowd pleasing and fan friendly style.
Comment
-
Pacquiao himself can’t keep Floyd out his mouth lol. They both will be talked about every hero needs a villain vise versa.
They will remember Pacquiao lost to Mayweather.
Comment
Comment