Let's differentiate fights between cherrypicks gone wrong...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daggum
    All time great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 43683
    • 4,650
    • 3
    • 166,270

    #21
    Originally posted by Dreamer213
    How was that a cherrypick??? Pacquiao was already a GREAT fighter when he fought Oscar so how is that a cherrypick??
    Oscar has ALWAYS fought the best so fighting at welterweight was the ONLY way this fight would of happened. So how is it a cherrypick???
    pac had zero fights at ww. zero figths at 140. 1 fight at 135. also we cant ignore the political implications that oscar had in that fight. pac was top ranks biggest star and he wanted to take him out. instead he ended up making him more popular.

    Comment

    • IronDanHamza
      BoxingScene Icon
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 49442
      • 5,022
      • 269
      • 104,043

      #22
      Originally posted by Dreamer213
      How was that a cherrypick??? Pacquiao was already a GREAT fighter when he fought Oscar so how is that a cherrypick??
      Oscar has ALWAYS fought the best so fighting at welterweight was the ONLY way this fight would of happened. So how is it a cherrypick???
      Yeah so clearly you weren't watching Boxing in 2008 And you're displaying what is known as revisionist history.

      The fight at the time was considered a total joke. Oscar claimed he was going to fight the Cotto-Margarito winner and he instead cherry picked Pacquaio who was campaigning 3 weight class lighter than him at the time and moved up 2 weight classes to fight him.

      It was a clear as day attempted cherry pick where all boxing experts predicted Pacquaio to get massacred. Instead, it backfired in the most hilarious of ways.

      That's how.

      Comment

      • Dreamer213
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Dec 2019
        • 196
        • 10
        • 0
        • 5,178

        #23
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza
        Yeah so clearly you weren't watching Boxing in 2008 And you're displaying what is known as revisionist history.

        The fight at the time was considered a total joke. Oscar claimed he was going to fight the Cotto-Margarito winner and he instead cherry picked Pacquaio who was campaigning 3 weight class lighter than him at the time and moved up 2 weight classes to fight him.

        It was a clear as day attempted cherry pick where all boxing experts predicted Pacquaio to get massacred. Instead, it backfired in the most hilarious of ways.

        That's how.
        Is that why Pacquiao went on to when multiple titles at welterweight and even fought as high as 150??? It was no cherrypick! You keep thinking what you want

        Comment

        • Dreamer213
          Banned
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Dec 2019
          • 196
          • 10
          • 0
          • 5,178

          #24
          Originally posted by daggum
          pac had zero fights at ww. zero figths at 140. 1 fight at 135. also we cant ignore the political implications that oscar had in that fight. pac was top ranks biggest star and he wanted to take him out. instead he ended up making him more popular.
          And??? Pacquiao went on to win multiple titles at welterweight and fought as high as 150 vs Margarito.
          So it was no cherrypick. Pacquiao has been fighting at welterweight for the past ten years. Are all his opponents cherrypicking Pacquiao???

          Comment

          • IronDanHamza
            BoxingScene Icon
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 49442
            • 5,022
            • 269
            • 104,043

            #25
            Originally posted by Dreamer213
            Is that why Pacquiao went on to when multiple titles at welterweight and even fought as high as 150??? It was no cherrypick! You keep thinking what you want
            Yeah.....AFTER THE FACT.

            That's literally by definition revisionist history. Literally.

            At the time, which is what matters, Pacquaio had just moved to 135. Oscar was campaigning at 154.

            It was a cherry pick. Everyone in boxing said it at the time and it backfired massively. That's just a fact and revising history won't change that.

            Pull up any article pre Oscar-Pacquaio and see what was said about it. A cherry pick, so much so Pacquaio was expected to get badly hurt

            Comment

            • Larry the boss
              EDUCATED
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 90798
              • 6,419
              • 4,473
              • 2,500,480

              #26
              Lara cherry picked a fellow world champ?

              Comment

              • buddyr
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2014
                • 5041
                • 1,288
                • 350
                • 34,653

                #27
                Hurd was a cherry pick? the first time I heard that lol

                Comment

                • buddyr
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Feb 2014
                  • 5041
                  • 1,288
                  • 350
                  • 34,653

                  #28
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                  Yeah so clearly you weren't watching Boxing in 2008 And you're displaying what is known as revisionist history.

                  The fight at the time was considered a total joke. Oscar claimed he was going to fight the Cotto-Margarito winner and he instead cherry picked Pacquaio who was campaigning 3 weight class lighter than him at the time and moved up 2 weight classes to fight him.

                  It was a clear as day attempted cherry pick where all boxing experts predicted Pacquaio to get massacred. Instead, it backfired in the most hilarious of ways.

                  That's how.
                  exactly. It was considered a joke because Pac was too small. I agree, you can tell by comments who just started watching boxing

                  Comment

                  • rickJen
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2017
                    • 8764
                    • 822
                    • 112
                    • 118,371

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Galactic Larry
                    Lara cherry picked a fellow world champ?
                    Originally posted by buddyr
                    Hurd was a cherry pick? the first time I heard that lol
                    Blah blah blah..
                    Explain why he didn't unify with the Charlo sisters.
                    Please don't give fans that silly they share the same trainer doe.
                    This is boxing, not a kumbaya family affair.
                    Andrade was also available, yet he cherry-picked Gausha.
                    Kills me with these fanatical fanboys.
                    Last edited by rickJen; 01-19-2020, 03:47 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Larry the boss
                      EDUCATED
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 90798
                      • 6,419
                      • 4,473
                      • 2,500,480

                      #30
                      Originally posted by genrick
                      Blah blah blah..
                      Explain why he didn't unify with the Charlo sisters.
                      Please don't give fans that silly they share the same trainer doe.
                      This is boxing, not a kumbaya family affair.
                      Andrade was also available, yet he cherry-picked Gausha.
                      Kills me with these fanatical fanboys.
                      unifying with a fellow champ can never be a cherry pick

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP