Wilder Fury II for the Ring title?

[N/A]

Sorry you are delusional, since when are three of 4 main belts garbage?

No, I'm not delusional, you just don't know how to read. Nobody said the belts are garbage. I said Fury threw them in the garbage.

Winner of Wilder -Fury must fight Joshua to determine who is N. 1, because Joshua has better resume then them combined.

That's not how rankings work. Whoever is #1 is #1. Right now, most consider Fury or Wilder #1. That division will be resolved once they fight each other. Very few consider Joshua #1 right now.

[N/A]

Current top 10 ranked fighters each of the top 10 has fought.

AJ = Whyte, Parker, Povetkin, Ruiz
Parker = AJ, Whyte, Ruiz
Whyte = AJ, Parker
Povetkin = AJ, Hunter
Ruiz = AJ, Parker
Hunter = Povetkin

Wilder = Fury, Ortiz
Fury = Wilder
Ortiz = Wilder

Your list is inaccurate. Parker isn't in the top 10. Neither is Hunter. Chisora is. Who cares if Joshua has fought more top 10 guys if one of them just made him quit. Also, fighting a top 5 opponent a second time is more impressive than fighting #10 for the first time. So you're all over the place here.

[JakeTheBoxer]

No, I'm not delusional, you just don't know how to read. Nobody said the belts are garbage. I said Fury threw them in the garbage.

Because re retired. Official, it was depresion, unofficial, peds.

[Jax teller]

Your list is inaccurate. Parker isn't in the top 10. Neither is Hunter. Chisora is. Who cares if Joshua has fought more top 10 guys if one of them just made him quit. Also, fighting a top 5 opponent a second time is more impressive than fighting #10 for the first time. So you're all over the place here.

Your all over the place.

Ortiz is No. 9 in boxrec the rankings your appear to use to exclude Hunter and Parker.

But Parker and Hunter are in the top ten ring HW's the only ranking that has Ortiz at no. 5 (outside the belt orgs).

Note Andy Ruiz and Dillian are ranked above Ortiz in all bar one where Ruiz is one place below.

0 Credibility poster.

[N/A]

You won't because you go by Boxrec rankings remember? Or is that only when it suits your agenda? You fat ****.

I expect Wilder to win and he'll likely return to #1 in boxrec at that point.

[N/A]

Ortiz is No. 9 in boxrec the rankings your appear to use to exclude Hunter and Parker.

I'm not excluding anybody. I already made it clear I was using Boxrec. Only UK fanboys have continued to use Ring Magazine after it was purchased by Golden Boy Promotions and all of the voters on the Ring ratings publicly confirmed that Golden Boy had corrupted the ratings.

[Robbie Barrett]

Your all over the place.

Ortiz is No. 9 in boxrec the rankings your appear to use to exclude Hunter and Parker.

But Parker and Hunter are in the top ten ring HW's the only ranking that has Ortiz at no. 5 (outside the belt orgs).

Note Andy Ruiz and Dillian are ranked above Ortiz in all bar one where Ruiz is one place below.

0 Credibility poster.

That's what he does, flip flops, misleads and lies to suit his agenda. Worst on the site for it.

[Robbie Barrett]

I expect Wilder to win and he'll likely return to #1 in boxrec at that point.

So how will they be lineal when the rankings you follow have neither Wilder or Fury #1? You cherry pick to suit your agenda.

[N/A]

So how will they be lineal when the rankings you follow have neither Wilder or Fury #1?

Because it doesn't matter what I follow. Lineal is controlled by the public and the media and neither gives a **** about Boxrec.

[Robbie Barrett]

Because it doesn't matter what I follow. Lineal is controlled by the public and the media and neither gives a **** about Boxrec.

So why do you use boxrec rankings to support your arguments when it suits you. But now they don't matter? FFS you're all over the place. YOU WON'T BE CALLING THEM LINEAL WILL YOU? I mean that won't be a good look for you credibility after arguing how great Boxrec is.