You dont have to fight 20 matches in 10 years.
You have to compete a significant amount of the decade with the most impressive wins.
He beat Canelo and Pacquiao this decade. He disqualifies both by nature of beating them in the decade.
If not Floyd, then it has to go to Canelo but again, Canelo lost to Floyd who is undefeated and 10 years older. So, who deserves it at that point?
You have to compete a significant amount of the decade with the most impressive wins.
He beat Canelo and Pacquiao this decade. He disqualifies both by nature of beating them in the decade.
If not Floyd, then it has to go to Canelo but again, Canelo lost to Floyd who is undefeated and 10 years older. So, who deserves it at that point?
Comment