Historian Monte Cox: Floyd no top 10 welter. No ATG.

[hugh grant]

Lol bradley was never that good. Jmm was not a welterweight, and he lost the war against him. Cotto was weight drained. DLH was washed and weight drained. Clottey is a decent win. Thurman is a good win. Not top 10 WW.

You scrutinise pac s w w resume in fine detail? Have you did that to all the others in top ten.? You have an opinion on pac and feel it's informed? How s your knowledge on Srr?

[LeOoze]

You scrutinise pac s w w resume in fine detail? Have you did that to all the others in top ten.? You have an opinion on pac and feel it's informed? How s your knowledge on Srr?

I do that for all resumes. I do the same for Floyd too. Both are great boxers but their resumes at 147.....ehhhh

[New England]

monte cox can suck a fat one. floyd is both of those things. without a doubt he's one of the best fighters of all time. top 25, let's say, without any fuss. none at all. he was ****ing amazingly skilled and he beat everyone they put in front of him decisively. took 2 tries twice but the rematches left no doubt!

ATG with a bullet

[davef]

This Forum really has a Mayweather complex he literally lives inside these ppl minds rent free

[BodyBagz]

Yea. He has him as a Top 10 featherweight ATG. Floyd is nowhere. As he says “Mayweather just does not have the competition to be considered a true all time great.”

Damn ''10 featherweight ATG'', huh

To hear Pac fans tell it, so called experts claim Pac IS an ATG WW right now

[BodyBagz]

Cotto*, DLH* AND shot, Mosley shot, Clottey, Rios shot, Algieri, Lucas shot, Broner, Vargas, HORN, Margarito* AND shot......definitely the stuff that makes a great WW resume.