BJS will never fight anyone!!! So he stop name dropping. He moved up and looks like shyt compared to 160 when he had a chance to beat top guys... But he ducked Canelo and GGG.
Rocked his last fight by Shefat Isufi and now almost outboxed by an Argentine Labouer his Dad employs to shovel tarmac, we all know what will happen next, he will continue to call out the big names to stay relevant and either fight an unknown ranked WBO fringe contender or rematch Charles Adamu LOL
This dude was putting hands on saunders. Top super middleweights will smash him.
Saunders is like Fury though, they don’t really perform until they face good fighters.
The Fury that fought Hammer should really get smashed by Wlad.
If anyone knows anything about boxing and followed BJS and his career, it’s pointless judging him on fights like this. He’s a fairly lazy fighter at times and drops and raises his level according to opposition, like Fury does. They’ve always been that way.
It’s not great viewing. If Saunders fights Canelo, you will see a totally different fighter, win or lose.
Also, nobody really knows how good or bad his opponent is. His opponent was undefeated, he might be from argentina and not really fought anyone, but nobody had beat him so there’s no performances of other fighters victories over him to compare with. There was a time when even great fighters were undefeated and never faced anyone good, so we can’t just assume a guy is no good because he hasn’t faced anyone of note. For all we know, maybe that opponent would give other good SMW’s a decent fight, there was no defeats on his record to say that he wouldn’t.
Saunders is like Fury though, they don’t really perform until they face good fighters.
The Fury that fought Hammer should really get smashed by Wlad.
If anyone knows anything about boxing and followed BJS and his career, it’s pointless judging him on fights like this. He’s a fairly lazy fighter at times and drops and raises his level according to opposition, like Fury does. They’ve always been that way.
It’s not great viewing. If Saunders fights Canelo, you will see a totally different fighter, win or lose.
What do you base that on? Andy Lee is likely Saunders best opponent to date and he lost more rounds than he won.
What do you base that on? Andy Lee is likely Saunders best opponent to date and he lost more rounds than he won.
Saunders won the fight didn’t he? It was his first venture anywhere near world level, dropped Lee twice and took his belt. Remember Andy Lee whooped Korobov for that belt, the man who just got robbed against Charlo not so long ago.
He also beat Lemieux, who isn’t great, but was still a world class fighter, former champ and legit top 10 in the division at the time, and he beat him without breaking a sweat in one of the biggest schoolings you will see.
Saunders resume isn’t great, nobody is saying that. But he’s proven he can beat world level fighters and do it well. We also know he can look average too.
All i’m saying is he isn’t a fighter that you can judge where he’s at right now on one performance, because he blows hot and cold like that. His next performance he could look great, it’s just how he is.
Comment