Canelo vs. GGG - Cherrypicking
Collapse
-
why even make this waste of a thread? thats like asking whos gayer out of lennox lewis and elton john. they dont call him cherrylovkin for nothingComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
it definitely DOES make you a problem. The problem with you and others who constantly make ****** threads criticizing one fighter is you never point out the bs your favorite fighter is pulling. How about you learn about the sport, go find a gym that will teach you about the sport, find some videos about the greats of this sport and get some education about the sport from celebrated boxing analysts who KNOW about the sport. Cause all youre doing is ball-licking. This isnt a gay forum. Go use your grinder app, weirdoComment
-
canelo was moving up from 164 to 160? aww your brain meltedLemieux was Saunder's sex slave, Derevyachenko was Jacob's leftovers, Brook was from a lower division, Murray never achieved anything, Jacobs was okay (for a cancer victim), but again, Canelo beat him just like Golovkin did.
I hate Golovkin because "fighters" like him are one of the main reasons why the sport is dying. He never takes any exciting fights and when he finally attempts to do it, which he only did against Canelo moving up in weight, he looked bad.Comment
-
Lemieux was Saunder's sex slave, Derevyachenko was Jacob's leftovers, Brook was from a lower division, Murray never achieved anything, Jacobs was okay (for a cancer victim), but again, Canelo beat him just like Golovkin did.
I hate Golovkin because "fighters" like him are one of the main reasons why the sport is dying. He never takes any exciting fights and when he finally attempts to do it, which he only did against Canelo moving up in weight, he looked bad.
That's not accurate. You really don't care if he achieves anything or if he takes exciting fights. In your mind he is receiving too much credit. It's the credit he's getting that bugs you. I don't know how he looked bad against Canelo when he clearly won the first fight and won the second despite a very good effort by Canelo. If anybody looked bad in the first fight it was Canelo who had a dumb game plan of going to the ropes. Despite what you think people had him winning both fights for valid reasons.Comment
-
Comment
-
How can people even say that Canelo's last 11 is better than GGG's with that list you put out...I mean I'll give my rankings here and see where it comes out...but at first glance I would say it looks very even, also taking into account what version/terms the fight was under:I like how you tell that ****ing troll to list the people they, GGG and Canelo, fought and dude cant even ****ing do that.
Look at their last 11 opponents
GGG
Derevychanko
Rolls
Canelo
Vanes
Canelo
Jacobs
Brooks
Wade
Lemieux
Monroe Jr.
Murry
Canelo
Kovalev
Jacobs
Fielding
GGG
GGG
Chavez Jr
Liam smith
Khan
Cotto
Kirkland
Lara
People say **** like Golovkin only fights smaller guys but is too afraid to fight above 160. Canelo is a small middle weight but we all know they're ****ing liars. GGGs resume not be spectacular but it's not trash ans Canelos isnt amazing.
Canelo is the king of fighting smaller guys/weight drained guys and the proof is in his resume. Look at the BOLD.
All the fighters Canelo dragged up to Middle Weight because dude couldn't make 154 so needed Canelo weight at 155.
But guy is so small he looks like he could be a legit 175lb guy and cant make 160 anymore.
1) GGG
2) Canelo
3) Canelo
4) GGG (ordering like that just to get them out of the way)
5) Jacobs 1 - G
6) Jacobs 2 - C
7) Kovalev - C
8) Derevychenko - G
9) Lara - C
10) Lemieux - G
11) Cotto - C
12) Murray - G
13) Monroe Jr - G
14) Brook - G
15) Liam Smith - C
16) Fielding - C
17) Rolls - G
18) Khan - C
19) Vanes - G
20) JCC Jr - C
21) Kirkland - C
22) Wade - G
I mean how is there any real difference there...makes 0 sense to meComment
-
Canelo fangirls like to make up lies. What's new. They hype up his resume like it's the holy grail of boxing and it's not. It's a very good resume but when looked at closely is more hype than reality.How can people even say that Canelo's last 11 is better than GGG's with that list you put out...I mean I'll give my rankings here and see where it comes out...but at first glance I would say it looks very even, also taking into account what version/terms the fight was under:
1) GGG
2) Canelo
3) Canelo
4) GGG (ordering like that just to get them out of the way)
5) Jacobs 1 - G
6) Jacobs 2 - C
7) Kovalev - C
8) Derevychenko - G
9) Lara - C
10) Lemieux - G
11) Cotto - C
12) Murray - G
13) Monroe Jr - G
14) Brook - G
15) Liam Smith - C
16) Fielding - C
17) Rolls - G
18) Khan - C
19) Vanes - G
20) JCC Jr - C
21) Kirkland - C
22) Wade - G
I mean how is there any real difference there...makes 0 sense to meComment
Comment