Comments Thread For: Taylor To Prograis: Take Your Sunglasses Off You F***ing W*nker!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Monty Fisto
    And still...
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2018
    • 3437
    • 1,465
    • 855
    • 22,690

    #31
    Originally posted by Ake-Dawg
    Who comes on a boxing site and comments about a guy wearing sunglasses. This is the hurt business. As long as you show up and throw hands, you can wear whatever you want. Lame...douche...wanker...all childish name calling from so called fans who couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag.
    The headline of the article is "Taylor to Prograis: Take Your Sunglasses Off You F***ing W*nker!".

    What else do you expect from the comments for this specific article?

    Commenting on the actual topic at hand has nothing to do with whether the commenter can 'fight their way out of a wet paper bag' or not.

    From where I stand, if you wear sunglasses indoors and you've got perfectly good eyes, it's an affectation. If someone calls you out for wearing sunglasses indoors, you have to accept that's a natural consequence of your affectation.

    Comment

    • ShaneMosleySr
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2019
      • 10325
      • 1,049
      • 903
      • 276,311

      #32
      “Prograis and Taylor get confrontational at presser” is a much better way to describe the story than the awful headline that was written.

      Comment

      • landotter
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2017
        • 4117
        • 1,364
        • 5,728
        • 33,265

        #33
        Currently typing, sunglasses on, indoors, and not wanking a thing. Honest. I would admit to you all if I was.

        Comment

        • Ake-Dawg
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2016
          • 5510
          • 127
          • 80
          • 76,361

          #34
          Originally posted by Monty Fisto
          The headline of the article is "Taylor to Prograis: Take Your Sunglasses Off You F***ing W*nker!".

          What else do you expect from the comments for this specific article?

          Commenting on the actual topic at hand has nothing to do with whether the commenter can 'fight their way out of a wet paper bag' or not.

          From where I stand, if you wear sunglasses indoors and you've got perfectly good eyes, it's an affectation. If someone calls you out for wearing sunglasses indoors, you have to accept that's a natural consequence of your affectation.
          Every article does not require comment. As a matter of fact, the lack of comments would discourage articles about sunglasses. Also...this is 2019. People wear sunglasses for fashion not just protection from the sun.

          Comment

          • john l
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2017
            • 5639
            • 124
            • 190
            • 54,474

            #35
            Originally posted by Koba-Grozny
            I'm not sure, man. Taylor is definitely a bit edgier by nature than Regis but you can't tell how that'll play in the ring... carrying nervous energy into the ring can be a boost but it can also lead to you burning energy unnecessarily. It ain't as simple as one being better than the other - lotta fighters say harnessing the nerves makes them perform better (and Cus D'amato extolled that idea) - but if I had to bet on two guys who are otherwise equal I'm leaning towards the more relaxed of the pair.
            Great point Koba. Having a temper in the ring is never a good idea. Being tense or too worked up will deff burn energy and can also lead to mistakes like trying to fire back right away after taking a good shot and getting your bell rung. I have never been a huge fan of Toney, but he was one of the most natural fighters I have seen. He was so relaxed in the ring that he was able to go 12rds easy even when he was out of shape(which was a lot). Emotions are for training camp and are best left there.

            Comment

            • TheUptownKid
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2009
              • 2237
              • 96
              • 69
              • 22,143

              #36
              Originally posted by EnglishOxide
              Do not underestimate the power of psychology. Little things like that can matter in boxing. That's why we have staredowns and press conferences.

              They all put their game face on for this reason before even getting in the ring.
              I won’t call you a casual, because i don’t know you. But the fact that you think this gives him an edge, something that’s strictly for the tv audience, doesn’t bode well for your boxing iq.

              Watch pac mans face offs. Watch Spence’s weigh ins. Then watch showmen like adrien broners weigh ins. Then tell me antics matter

              Comment

              • TheUptownKid
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2009
                • 2237
                • 96
                • 69
                • 22,143

                #37
                Originally posted by DaNeutral.
                LOL clout chasing off of Prograis? You have having a laugh. Who the hell knows Prograis?
                Clout chasing by grand standing with security present. He’s chasing the clout of the audience. He wants them to believe he’s a big bad man because he can use curse words. It’s false bravado like I said. Something bullies say to build themselves up before a fight

                Comment

                • smeck
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Mar 2014
                  • 249
                  • 13
                  • 0
                  • 13,980

                  #38
                  The point of a stare-down is EYE to EYE.
                  Not eye to plastic.
                  The American stand-up Jonathan Winters was on this 50 years ago: "I see some guy wearing sunglasses inside, and he's a phony. The only excuse is if he's got pink-eye."

                  Comment

                  • Tha Kid
                    Interim Champion
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 741
                    • 39
                    • 0
                    • 17,814

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Split Decision
                    horrible banter
                    What can I say? Much respect to both Warriors. I had Prograis winning a close decision but I'm cool with it. Much respect to Taylor ✊🏾

                    Comment

                    • Chrismart
                      OK Jim...
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 14274
                      • 837
                      • 1,761
                      • 308,493

                      #40


                      Haha, fair play.

                      .
                      .

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP