Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Taylor To Prograis: Take Your Sunglasses Off You F***ing W*nker!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
    Who comes on a boxing site and comments about a guy wearing sunglasses. This is the hurt business. As long as you show up and throw hands, you can wear whatever you want. Lame...douche...wanker...all childish name calling from so called fans who couldn't fight their way out of a wet paper bag.
    The headline of the article is "Taylor to Prograis: Take Your Sunglasses Off You F***ing W*nker!".

    What else do you expect from the comments for this specific article?

    Commenting on the actual topic at hand has nothing to do with whether the commenter can 'fight their way out of a wet paper bag' or not.

    From where I stand, if you wear sunglasses indoors and you've got perfectly good eyes, it's an affectation. If someone calls you out for wearing sunglasses indoors, you have to accept that's a natural consequence of your affectation.

    Comment


    • #32
      “Prograis and Taylor get confrontational at presser” is a much better way to describe the story than the awful headline that was written.

      Comment


      • #33
        Currently typing, sunglasses on, indoors, and not wanking a thing. Honest. I would admit to you all if I was.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Monty Fisto View Post
          The headline of the article is "Taylor to Prograis: Take Your Sunglasses Off You F***ing W*nker!".

          What else do you expect from the comments for this specific article?

          Commenting on the actual topic at hand has nothing to do with whether the commenter can 'fight their way out of a wet paper bag' or not.

          From where I stand, if you wear sunglasses indoors and you've got perfectly good eyes, it's an affectation. If someone calls you out for wearing sunglasses indoors, you have to accept that's a natural consequence of your affectation.
          Every article does not require comment. As a matter of fact, the lack of comments would discourage articles about sunglasses. Also...this is 2019. People wear sunglasses for fashion not just protection from the sun.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View Post
            I'm not sure, man. Taylor is definitely a bit edgier by nature than Regis but you can't tell how that'll play in the ring... carrying nervous energy into the ring can be a boost but it can also lead to you burning energy unnecessarily. It ain't as simple as one being better than the other - lotta fighters say harnessing the nerves makes them perform better (and Cus D'amato extolled that idea) - but if I had to bet on two guys who are otherwise equal I'm leaning towards the more relaxed of the pair.
            Great point Koba. Having a temper in the ring is never a good idea. Being tense or too worked up will deff burn energy and can also lead to mistakes like trying to fire back right away after taking a good shot and getting your bell rung. I have never been a huge fan of Toney, but he was one of the most natural fighters I have seen. He was so relaxed in the ring that he was able to go 12rds easy even when he was out of shape(which was a lot). Emotions are for training camp and are best left there.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post
              Do not underestimate the power of psychology. Little things like that can matter in boxing. That's why we have staredowns and press conferences.

              They all put their game face on for this reason before even getting in the ring.
              I won’t call you a casual, because i don’t know you. But the fact that you think this gives him an edge, something that’s strictly for the tv audience, doesn’t bode well for your boxing iq.

              Watch pac mans face offs. Watch Spence’s weigh ins. Then watch showmen like adrien broners weigh ins. Then tell me antics matter

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by DaNeutral. View Post
                LOL clout chasing off of Prograis? You have having a laugh. Who the hell knows Prograis?
                Clout chasing by grand standing with security present. He’s chasing the clout of the audience. He wants them to believe he’s a big bad man because he can use curse words. It’s false bravado like I said. Something bullies say to build themselves up before a fight

                Comment


                • #38
                  The point of a stare-down is EYE to EYE.
                  Not eye to plastic.
                  The American stand-up Jonathan Winters was on this 50 years ago: "I see some guy wearing sunglasses inside, and he's a phony. The only excuse is if he's got pink-eye."

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Split Decision View Post
                    horrible banter
                    What can I say? Much respect to both Warriors. I had Prograis winning a close decision but I'm cool with it. Much respect to Taylor ✊🏾

                    Comment


                    • #40


                      Haha, fair play.

                      .
                      .

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP